PunjiPUNJI
Sectoral/ Thematicquant Money Managers Limited

quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan

Benchmark: NIFTY100 ESG TRI · Riskometer: Very High

quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund is a Sectoral/ Thematic mutual fund managed by quant Money Managers Limited, benchmarked against NIFTY100 ESG TRI. Riskometer: Very High.

View full analysis on Punji.ai →

₹39.8669

NAV (2026-10-28)

₹326.861 Cr

AUM

1.84%

EXPENSE RATIO (DIRECT)

2020-10-15

INCEPTION

NAV History

LEARN: Growth of ₹100 · NAV · CAGR

CHART

quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund - growth of ₹100

Growth of ₹100 invested on 2021-10-31, not raw NAV - the standard way to compare fund performance regardless of NAV level. Daily resolution for the last 90 days, weekly up to 2 years, monthly beyond that.

-24481191902622021-10-312023-12-312025-02-162025-08-172026-02-152026-08-022026-08-302026-10-042026-10-28
NAV History - Last 30 Days(exact daily NAV)
DateNAV (₹)1D Change
2026-10-2839.8669-0.501 (-1.2%)
2026-10-2740.3679+0.3307 (+0.8%)
2026-10-2640.0372+0.5926 (+1.5%)
2026-10-2539.4446+0 (+0%)
2026-10-2339.4446-1.1699 (-2.9%)
2026-10-2240.6145-0.4726 (-1.2%)
2026-10-2141.0871-0.606 (-1.5%)
2026-10-2041.6931+0 (+0%)
2026-10-1941.6931-0.297 (-0.7%)
2026-10-1841.9901+0 (+0%)
2026-10-1641.9901+0.2087 (+0.5%)
2026-10-1541.7814-0.0693 (-0.2%)
2026-10-1441.8507-0.1091 (-0.3%)
2026-10-1341.9598+0.4372 (+1.1%)
2026-10-1241.5226-0.007 (+0%)
2026-10-1141.5296+0 (+0%)
2026-10-0941.5296+0.6476 (+1.6%)
2026-10-0840.882-1.489 (-3.5%)
2026-10-0742.371-0.0638 (-0.2%)
2026-10-0642.4348+0.5882 (+1.4%)
2026-10-0541.8466+0.4437 (+1.1%)
2026-10-0441.4029+0 (+0%)
2026-10-0141.4029-0.0694 (-0.2%)
2026-09-3041.4723-
AQuality · 85/100
DSafety · 45.4/100
BCompound · 73.4/100

Punji Fund Health Score - percentile-within-category. See methodology.

CATEGORY COMPARISON

0.41

3Y Sharpe Ratio

#34 of 108 - median 0.23

5.2%

3Y Alpha

#14 of 107 - median 1.2%

17.3%

3Y Std Deviation

#83 of 108 - median 15.2%

1.84%

Total Expense Ratio

#95 of 174 - median 1.20%

₹327 Cr

AUM

#148 of 174 - median ₹1,271 Cr

100%

3Y Beat Benchmark %

vs NIFTY100 ESG TRI

quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund returns

Lumpsum returns: full range of outcomes across every overlapping window in the fund's history for each holding period, not one trailing number.

Holding periodMin rolling CAGRMedian rolling CAGRMax rolling CAGR
1Y-16.5%+19%+91.5%
3Y+11.8%+21.3%+38.2%

Actual point-to-point CAGR for the single best and single worst overlapping window of each holding period in the fund's history - historical fact, not a forecast. Independent of the lumpsum/SIP toggle above - always CAGR-based.

Holding periodBest windowWorst windowBeat benchmark
1Y+91.5% (2020-11-10 → 2021-11-10)-16.5% (2024-08-30 → 2025-08-30)100%
3Y+38.2% (2020-11-16 → 2023-11-16)+11.8% (2022-04-08 → 2025-04-07)100%

quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund category rank vs peers

MetricValueRankCategory median
3Y Rolling CAGR21.3%#18 of 102 17.4%
3Y Sharpe Ratio0.41#34 of 108 0.23
3Y Alpha5.2%#14 of 107 1.2%
3Y Std Deviation17.3%#83 of 108 (lower is better)15.2%
Total Expense Ratio1.84%#95 of 174 (lower is better)1.20%
AUM₹327 Cr#148 of 174 ₹1,271 Cr
3Y Max Drawdown25.06%#90 of 108 (lower is better)20.66%

quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund risk metrics

3-year window vs. NIFTY100 ESG TRI.

quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund holdings

Portfolio as of 2026-09-30

Hold multiple funds? See our Portfolio Overlap Tool to see if they actually hold different stocks.

CHART

Top sector holdings

Share of portfolio (% to NAV) in each of the top sectors.

17.9373%13.6383%9.429192%8.5265%8.196862%7.8196%7.7353%6.3941%TOP 15104%
Telecom - Services 17.9373%Finance 13.6383%Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology 9.429192%Metals & Minerals Trading 8.5265%Petroleum Products 8.196862%Power 7.8196%Consumer Durables 7.7353%Capital Markets 6.3941%Other 5.641351%Retailing 5.426443%IT - Services 4.1796%Aerospace & Defense 3.8726%IT - Software 2.838609%Transport Services 1.258%Personal Products 0.776343%

TOP HOLDINGS

TREPS 01-Oct-2026 DEPO 10 ()15.395%
Indus Towers Limited (Telecom - Services)9.8404%
Adani Enterprises Limited (Metals & Minerals Trading)8.5265%
Reliance Industries Ltd. (Petroleum Products)8.196862%
HFCL Limited (Telecom - Services)8.0969%
Adani Green Energy Limited (Power)7.8196%
LG Electronics India Limited (Consumer Durables)7.7353%
Piramal Finance Ltd (Finance)7.4295%
Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd (Capital Markets)6.3941%
Capri Global Capital Limited (Finance)6.2088%

Funds similar to quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund

Top funds in the same category, ranked by performance - not holdings overlap. Pick up to 2 to compare alongside this fund:

quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund Punji analytics

ADVANCED RISK-ADJUSTED METRICS

3-year window vs. NIFTY100 ESG TRI. Not commonly published by other Indian fund platforms.

CHART

Asset Allocation

As of Sep-2026

77.22%7.39%TOP 383%
Equity 77.22%Debt 7.39%Cash -1.75%

CHART

Market Cap Split

As of Sep-2026

26.1865%27.4156%23.6159%TOP 377%
Large 26.1865%Mid 27.4156%Small 23.6159%

CHART

Credit Quality

As of Sep-2026

22.78%TOP 423%
AAA 0%AA 0%Sovereign 0%Other 22.78%

Portfolio analytics as of Sep-2026.

Frequently asked questions

How often has quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund beaten its benchmark over 3-year periods?

quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund beat its benchmark, NIFTY100 ESG TRI, in 100% of all overlapping 3-year rolling windows in its history. This is different from simply having a positive return - it measures how often the fund's own 3-year CAGR exceeded the benchmark's 3-year CAGR over the exact same dates, which is a more direct read on the manager's stock selection than a single trailing alpha figure computed over one window.

What is quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund's 3-year rolling return, and how does it rank?

quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR (median across all rolling 3-year windows in the data) is 21.3%. That places it in the 83rd percentile within its category, Sectoral/ Thematic - meaning it has outperformed roughly 83% of peers in the same category over this window. The category median for this metric is 17.4%, so comparing quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund's figure against that median shows how much it has beaten (or trailed) a typical fund in this category. Rolling returns average performance across many overlapping windows rather than a single start/end date, which makes them a steadier read on consistency than a simple point-to-point return.

How risky is quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund?

quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund carries a "Very High" risk rating on SEBI's mandated riskometer scale, the same standardized classification every Indian mutual fund must disclose. This rating reflects the fund's underlying portfolio composition and historical volatility, and is set independently of any single AMC's own marketing - it's meant to give investors a comparable, at-a-glance sense of how much the fund's value can swing before deciding whether it matches their own risk appetite and investment horizon. A higher-risk rating isn't inherently bad; it typically correlates with higher long-term return potential, but also with larger short-term drawdowns, so it should be read alongside the fund's category and your own time horizon rather than in isolation.

What is quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund's expense ratio?

quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 1.84% per year - the annual fee the AMC deducts from the fund's assets to cover management and operating costs, already reflected in the NAV you see (it isn't billed separately). Direct plans skip the distributor commission built into Regular plans, which is why a direct-plan expense ratio is almost always lower than the same scheme's Regular-plan version. Over long holding periods, even a difference of a few basis points compounds into a meaningfully different final corpus, which is why expense ratio is one of the few fund attributes an investor can compare with total certainty before investing, unlike future returns.

How does quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund's expense ratio compare to its category?

quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund's expense ratio of 1.84% ranks #95 of 174 funds in the Sectoral/ Thematic category (lower is better) - the category median is 1.20%. Expense ratio is deducted from the fund's assets every year regardless of performance, so a lower ratio is a real, certain cost advantage rather than a projection, unlike future returns.

How big is quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund, and how does that compare to its category?

quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund manages ₹327 Cr in assets, ranking #148 of 174 funds by size in the Sectoral/ Thematic category - the category median is ₹1,271 Cr. A larger fund generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but in categories with a smaller investable universe (like small or mid cap), a very large fund can also face more difficulty entering and exiting positions without moving the price.

What's the worst drawdown quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund has experienced, and how does that compare to its category?

quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund's worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 3 years was 25.06%, ranking #90 of 108 funds in the Sectoral/ Thematic category (lower is better) - the category median is 20.66%. Max drawdown measures the deepest loss an investor holding through the worst stretch would have seen, before any recovery - a smaller number means a gentler ride, though it says nothing about how long the fund took to recover.

How has quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund performed against its benchmark, NIFTY100 ESG TRI?

Over a 3-year window, quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund has outperformed its benchmark, NIFTY100 ESG TRI, by 5.2% (alpha). Alpha measures the fund's return in excess of what its benchmark alone would have delivered, after adjusting for the risk taken (beta of 1.03 here) - a positive alpha means the fund manager's stock selection and allocation calls added real value beyond simply tracking the market, while a negative alpha means the fund would have been better replicated by a low-cost index fund tracking the same benchmark. This is a trailing, historical figure and isn't a guarantee of future outperformance.

What's the best and worst 3-year holding period for quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund historically?

Looking at every overlapping 3-year window in quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund's history, the best-performing window ran from 2020-11-16 to 2023-11-16, delivering a 38.2% CAGR. The worst-performing window ran from 2022-04-08 to 2025-04-07, delivering a 11.8% CAGR. This is a historical record of actual past outcomes, not a prediction - it shows the real range of results an investor holding for exactly 3 years could have seen depending on entry timing, which is why rolling returns (median across all windows, shown above) are a more representative single number than either extreme.

How concentrated are quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund's top holdings?

quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund's single largest disclosed holding, TREPS 01-Oct-2026 DEPO 10, accounts for 15.395% of NAV. Its top 5 holdings together make up 50.1% of the portfolio, and its top 10 disclosed holdings make up 85.6% - as of 2026-09-30. A higher concentration in the top few names means the fund's returns lean more heavily on those specific bets paying off, while a flatter spread means no single holding drives outcomes as much either way.

Who manages quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund, and what category does it belong to?

quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund is managed by quant Money Managers Limited and is classified under the Sectoral/ Thematic category, the SEBI-defined scheme categorization that groups funds by their investment mandate (market-cap focus, sector, or asset mix) so investors can compare like-for-like funds rather than across unrelated strategies. The AMC (asset management company) is the regulated entity legally responsible for the fund's operations, portfolio decisions, and disclosures, though day-to-day investment calls are made by a designated fund manager within the mandate set by the scheme's category and stated objective.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.