PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth vs quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan

Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth and quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund are both in the Sectoral/ Thematic category, from Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Limited and quant Money Managers Limited respectively. quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.65 percentage points.

Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growthquant ESG Integration Strategy Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan
CategorySectoral/ ThematicSectoral/ Thematic
AMCAditya Birla Sun Life AMC Limitedquant Money Managers Limited
BenchmarkBSE 500 TRINIFTY100 ESG TRI
NAV₹29.61 (2026-10-28)₹39.8669 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹1,356.868 Cr₹326.861 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)1.19%1.84%
Inception2020-10-052020-10-15

Returns

quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (21.3% vs Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth's 19.9%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.

Risk Metrics

quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.

Portfolio Analytics

quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.

Punji Fund Health Score

Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth and quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund carry the same Punji Quality grade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a higher 3-year return, Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth or quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund?

quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 21.3% is higher than Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth's 19.9%. quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund sits in the 83rd percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 75th percentile for Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.

Which has a lower expense ratio, Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth or quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund?

Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.65 percentage points lower than quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Which fund carries more risk, Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth or quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund?

By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund has been more volatile than Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.64 for Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth vs 0.41 for quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.

Which has higher AUM, Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth or quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund?

Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth has ₹1,357 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹327 Cr for quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which fund has a longer track record, Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth or quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund?

Aditya Birla Sun Life Special Opportunities Fund-Direct-Growth launched on 2020-10-05, making it older than quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund (launched 2020-10-15). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.