PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Debt - Direct Plan - Growth Option vs Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Moderate Plan -Direct Plan-Growth Option

ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Debt and Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Moderate Plan - are both in the Retirement Fund category, from ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited and Tata Asset Management Limited respectively. ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Debt has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Moderate Plan - has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Moderate Plan - has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.39 percentage points.

ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Debt - Direct Plan - Growth OptionTata Retirement Savings Fund- Moderate Plan -Direct Plan-Growth Option
CategoryRetirement FundRetirement Fund
AMCICICI Prudential Asset Management Company LimitedTata Asset Management Limited
BenchmarkNIFTY Composite Debt IndexCRISIL Hybrid 25+75 - Aggressive Index
NAV₹17.0681 (2026-10-28)₹76.5783 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹78.337 Cr₹2,053.64 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)1.22%0.83%
Inception2019-02-072011-10-07

Returns

ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Debt leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (6.7% vs Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Moderate Plan -'s 15.3%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.

Risk Metrics

Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Moderate Plan - has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.

Portfolio Analytics

Punji Fund Health Score

Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Moderate Plan - has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a higher 3-year return, ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Debt or Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Moderate Plan -?

ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Debt's 3-year rolling CAGR of 6.7% is higher than Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Moderate Plan -'s 15.3%. ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Debt sits in the 7th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 78th percentile for Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Moderate Plan - - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.

Which has a lower expense ratio, ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Debt or Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Moderate Plan -?

Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Moderate Plan -'s direct-plan expense ratio is 0.39 percentage points lower than ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Debt's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Which fund carries more risk, ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Debt or Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Moderate Plan -?

By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Moderate Plan - has been more volatile than ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Debt over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (-0.61 for ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Debt vs 0.19 for Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Moderate Plan -) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.

Which has higher AUM, ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Debt or Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Moderate Plan -?

Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Moderate Plan - has ₹2,054 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹78 Cr for ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Debt. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which fund has a longer track record, ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Debt or Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Moderate Plan -?

Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Moderate Plan - launched on 2011-10-07, making it older than ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Debt (launched 2019-02-07). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.