COMPARE
ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Hybrid Aggressive - Direct Plan - Growth Option vs Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Conservative Plan-Direct Plan-Growth Option
ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Hybrid Aggressive and Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Conservative Plan- are both in the Retirement Fund category, from ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited and Tata Asset Management Limited respectively. Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Conservative Plan- has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Conservative Plan- has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Conservative Plan- has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.18 percentage points.
| ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Hybrid Aggressive - Direct Plan - Growth Option | Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Conservative Plan-Direct Plan-Growth Option | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Retirement Fund | Retirement Fund |
| AMC | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited |
| Benchmark | CRISIL Hybrid 35+65 - Aggressive Index | CRISIL Short Term Debt Hybrid 75+25 Index |
| NAV | ₹29.16 (2026-10-28) | ₹37.7618 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹1,223.544 Cr | ₹160.49 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.23% | 1.05% |
| Inception | 2019-02-07 | 2011-10-07 |
Returns
Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Conservative Plan- leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (9.2% vs ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Hybrid Aggressive's 20.7%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Hybrid Aggressive has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
Portfolio Analytics
ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Hybrid Aggressive carries the higher portfolio YTM.
| ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Hybrid Aggressive - Direct Plan - Growth Option | Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Conservative Plan-Direct Plan-Growth Option | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | - | 29.3768 |
| P/B Ratio | - | 6.656 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.87% | 0.8386% |
| Active Share | - | - |
| Portfolio Turnover | - | 129% |
| YTM | 7.8919% | 6.67% |
| Duration (Macaulay) | 2.87 yrs | 4.71 yrs |
Punji Fund Health Score
ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Hybrid Aggressive has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Hybrid Aggressive or Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Conservative Plan-?
Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Conservative Plan-'s 3-year rolling CAGR of 9.2% is higher than ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Hybrid Aggressive's 20.7%. Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Conservative Plan- sits in the 30th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 96th percentile for ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Hybrid Aggressive - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Hybrid Aggressive or Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Conservative Plan-?
Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Conservative Plan-'s direct-plan expense ratio is 0.18 percentage points lower than ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Hybrid Aggressive's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Hybrid Aggressive or Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Conservative Plan-?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Hybrid Aggressive has been more volatile than Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Conservative Plan- over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.52 for ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Hybrid Aggressive vs -0.11 for Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Conservative Plan-) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Hybrid Aggressive or Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Conservative Plan-?
ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Hybrid Aggressive has ₹1,224 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹160 Cr for Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Conservative Plan-. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which has a higher yield to maturity (YTM), ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Hybrid Aggressive or Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Conservative Plan-?
ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Hybrid Aggressive's portfolio YTM (7.8919%) is higher than Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Conservative Plan-'s. YTM is the weighted-average return a debt fund's current bond holdings would earn if held to maturity, assuming no defaults and coupons reinvested at the same rate - a useful forward-looking yield estimate for debt funds the way rolling CAGR is for equity funds, though it's an estimate based on today's portfolio, not a guaranteed return, and can move as bonds are bought/sold or as interest rates change.
Which has longer duration (more interest-rate sensitivity), ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Hybrid Aggressive or Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Conservative Plan-?
Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Conservative Plan- has the longer Macaulay duration of the two, meaning its NAV is more sensitive to interest-rate changes - a longer-duration debt fund tends to gain more when rates fall and lose more when rates rise, compared to a shorter-duration fund. Duration is expressed in years but isn't literally about how long you hold the fund; it's a measure of price sensitivity to rate moves. If you expect rates to fall, the longer-duration fund benefits more; if you expect rates to rise or want to minimize that swing, the shorter-duration fund is the more conservative pick.
Which fund has a longer track record, ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Hybrid Aggressive or Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Conservative Plan-?
Tata Retirement Savings Fund- Conservative Plan- launched on 2011-10-07, making it older than ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Hybrid Aggressive (launched 2019-02-07). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.