COMPARE
Shriram Money Market Fund - Direct Plan Growth Option vs UTI MMF - Direct Plan - Growth Option
Shriram Money Market Fund and UTI MMF are both in the Money Market Fund category, from Shriram Asset Management Co. Ltd. and UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. respectively. Shriram Money Market Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Shriram Money Market Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.05 percentage points.
| Shriram Money Market Fund - Direct Plan Growth Option | UTI MMF - Direct Plan - Growth Option | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Money Market Fund | Money Market Fund |
| AMC | Shriram Asset Management Co. Ltd. | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Benchmark | No benchmark required for this fund category | No benchmark required for this fund category |
| NAV | ₹1047.8281 (2026-10-28) | ₹3393.6358 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹75.771 Cr | ₹16,573.797 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 0.12% | 0.17% |
| Inception | 2026-01-19 | 1997-04-23 |
Returns
This fund is less than a year old, so there is not yet enough history to calculate rolling returns.
Risk Metrics
Risk metrics aren't shown for debt funds. Their NAV starts near Rs 10 and compounds steadily, so CAGR, beta and drawdown measure the arithmetic rather than the manager.
Portfolio Analytics
Punji Fund Health Score
Shriram Money Market Fund and UTI MMF carry the same Punji Quality grade.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a lower expense ratio, Shriram Money Market Fund or UTI MMF?
Shriram Money Market Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.05 percentage points lower than UTI MMF's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Why don't Shriram Money Market Fund and UTI MMF show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?
Risk metrics aren't shown for debt funds. Their NAV starts near Rs 10 and compounds steadily, so CAGR, beta and drawdown measure the arithmetic rather than the manager. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.
Which has higher AUM, Shriram Money Market Fund or UTI MMF?
UTI MMF has ₹16,574 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹76 Cr for Shriram Money Market Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, Shriram Money Market Fund or UTI MMF?
UTI MMF launched on 1997-04-23, making it older than Shriram Money Market Fund (launched 2026-01-19). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.