COMPARE
Shriram Liquid Fund - Direct Plan Growth Option vs Sundaram Liquid Fund (Formerly Known as Principal Cash Management Fund) - Direct Plan - Growth Option
Shriram Liquid Fund and Sundaram Liquid Fund are both in the Liquid Fund category, from Shriram Asset Management Co. Ltd. and Sundaram Asset Management Company Ltd respectively. Sundaram Liquid Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Sundaram Liquid Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.02 percentage points.
| Shriram Liquid Fund - Direct Plan Growth Option | Sundaram Liquid Fund (Formerly Known as Principal Cash Management Fund) - Direct Plan - Growth Option | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Liquid Fund | Liquid Fund |
| AMC | Shriram Asset Management Co. Ltd. | Sundaram Asset Management Company Ltd |
| Benchmark | No benchmark required for this fund category | No benchmark required for this fund category |
| NAV | ₹1129.0912 (2026-10-28) | ₹2528.9988 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹654.697 Cr | ₹7,229.91 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 0.16% | 0.14% |
| Inception | 2024-11-04 | 2000-10-03 |
Returns
Risk Metrics
Risk metrics aren't shown for debt funds. Their NAV starts near Rs 10 and compounds steadily, so CAGR, beta and drawdown measure the arithmetic rather than the manager.
Portfolio Analytics
Punji Fund Health Score
Shriram Liquid Fund and Sundaram Liquid Fund carry the same Punji Quality grade.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a lower expense ratio, Shriram Liquid Fund or Sundaram Liquid Fund?
Sundaram Liquid Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.02 percentage points lower than Shriram Liquid Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Why don't Shriram Liquid Fund and Sundaram Liquid Fund show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?
Risk metrics aren't shown for debt funds. Their NAV starts near Rs 10 and compounds steadily, so CAGR, beta and drawdown measure the arithmetic rather than the manager. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.
Which has higher AUM, Shriram Liquid Fund or Sundaram Liquid Fund?
Sundaram Liquid Fund has ₹7,230 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹655 Cr for Shriram Liquid Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, Shriram Liquid Fund or Sundaram Liquid Fund?
Sundaram Liquid Fund launched on 2000-10-03, making it older than Shriram Liquid Fund (launched 2024-11-04). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.