COMPARE
SBI Dividend Yield Fund - Direct Plan - Growth vs Sundaram Dividend Yield Fund (Formerly Known as Principal Dividend Yield Fund) - Direct Plan - Growth Option
SBI Dividend Yield Fund and Sundaram Dividend Yield Fund are both in the Dividend Yield Fund category, from SBI Funds Management Limited and Sundaram Asset Management Company Ltd respectively. SBI Dividend Yield Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
SBI Dividend Yield Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.14 percentage points.
| SBI Dividend Yield Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | Sundaram Dividend Yield Fund (Formerly Known as Principal Dividend Yield Fund) - Direct Plan - Growth Option | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Dividend Yield Fund | Dividend Yield Fund |
| AMC | SBI Funds Management Limited | Sundaram Asset Management Company Ltd |
| Benchmark | Nifty 500 TRI | Nifty 500 TRI |
| NAV | ₹15.4591 (2026-10-30) | ₹138.4311 (2026-10-30) |
| AUM | ₹7,803.81 Cr | ₹750.93 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.12% | 1.26% |
| Inception | 2023-02-20 | 2004-09-06 |
Returns
Risk Metrics
Sundaram Dividend Yield Fund has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
Portfolio Analytics
SBI Dividend Yield Fund carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.
| SBI Dividend Yield Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | Sundaram Dividend Yield Fund (Formerly Known as Principal Dividend Yield Fund) - Direct Plan - Growth Option | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 22.4184 | 15.6933 |
| P/B Ratio | 4.035 | 4.2355 |
| Dividend Yield | 1.2435% | 2.5561% |
| Active Share | 76.67% | - |
| Portfolio Turnover | 49% | 1700% |
| YTM | 5.3459% | - |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
SBI Dividend Yield Fund and Sundaram Dividend Yield Fund carry the same Punji Quality grade.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a lower expense ratio, SBI Dividend Yield Fund or Sundaram Dividend Yield Fund?
SBI Dividend Yield Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.14 percentage points lower than Sundaram Dividend Yield Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, SBI Dividend Yield Fund or Sundaram Dividend Yield Fund?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), Sundaram Dividend Yield Fund has been more volatile than SBI Dividend Yield Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.21 for SBI Dividend Yield Fund vs 0.11 for Sundaram Dividend Yield Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, SBI Dividend Yield Fund or Sundaram Dividend Yield Fund?
SBI Dividend Yield Fund has ₹7,804 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹751 Cr for Sundaram Dividend Yield Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, SBI Dividend Yield Fund or Sundaram Dividend Yield Fund?
Sundaram Dividend Yield Fund launched on 2004-09-06, making it older than SBI Dividend Yield Fund (launched 2023-02-20). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-11-01. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.