COMPARE
SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund - Direct Plan - Growth vs UTI Nifty 500 Value 50 Index Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option
SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund and UTI Nifty 500 Value 50 Index Fund are both in the Index Funds category, from SBI Funds Management Limited and UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. respectively. SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.54 percentage points.
| SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | UTI Nifty 500 Value 50 Index Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Index Funds | Index Funds |
| AMC | SBI Funds Management Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Benchmark | CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 | NIFTY500 Value 50 TRI |
| NAV | ₹13.3368 (2026-10-28) | ₹20.3339 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹1,969.018 Cr | ₹828.438 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 0.21% | 0.75% |
| Inception | 2022-09-26 | 2023-04-26 |
Returns
SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (8.1% vs UTI Nifty 500 Value 50 Index Fund's 26.4%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
This fund tracks an index, so measuring alpha against that same index would only report its tracking error.
Portfolio Analytics
Punji Fund Health Score
SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund and UTI Nifty 500 Value 50 Index Fund carry the same Punji Quality grade.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund or UTI Nifty 500 Value 50 Index Fund?
SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 8.1% is higher than UTI Nifty 500 Value 50 Index Fund's 26.4%. SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund sits in the 42nd percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 98th percentile for UTI Nifty 500 Value 50 Index Fund - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund or UTI Nifty 500 Value 50 Index Fund?
SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.54 percentage points lower than UTI Nifty 500 Value 50 Index Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Why don't SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund and UTI Nifty 500 Value 50 Index Fund show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?
This fund tracks an index, so measuring alpha against that same index would only report its tracking error. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.
Which has higher AUM, SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund or UTI Nifty 500 Value 50 Index Fund?
SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund has ₹1,969 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹828 Cr for UTI Nifty 500 Value 50 Index Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund or UTI Nifty 500 Value 50 Index Fund?
SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund launched on 2022-09-26, making it older than UTI Nifty 500 Value 50 Index Fund (launched 2023-04-26). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.