PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan - DIRECT PLAN - GROWTH vs Union Children's Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option

SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan and Union Children's Fund are both in the Children s Fund category, from SBI Funds Management Limited and Union Asset Management Company Private Limited respectively. SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.56 percentage points.

SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan - DIRECT PLAN - GROWTHUnion Children's Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option
CategoryChildren s FundChildren s Fund
AMCSBI Funds Management LimitedUnion Asset Management Company Private Limited
BenchmarkNIFTY 50 Hybrid Composite Debt 15:85 IndexBSE 500 TRI
NAV₹128.636 (2026-10-28)₹12.38 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹149.364 Cr₹88.878 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)0.91%1.47%
Inception2001-12-282023-11-28

Returns

Risk Metrics

Union Children's Fund has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.

Portfolio Analytics

SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan carries the higher portfolio YTM.

Punji Fund Health Score

Union Children's Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a lower expense ratio, SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan or Union Children's Fund?

SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.56 percentage points lower than Union Children's Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Which fund carries more risk, SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan or Union Children's Fund?

By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), Union Children's Fund has been more volatile than SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.72 for SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan vs 0.01 for Union Children's Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.

Which has higher AUM, SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan or Union Children's Fund?

SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan has ₹149 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹89 Cr for Union Children's Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which has a higher yield to maturity (YTM), SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan or Union Children's Fund?

SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan's portfolio YTM (7.9651%) is higher than Union Children's Fund's. YTM is the weighted-average return a debt fund's current bond holdings would earn if held to maturity, assuming no defaults and coupons reinvested at the same rate - a useful forward-looking yield estimate for debt funds the way rolling CAGR is for equity funds, though it's an estimate based on today's portfolio, not a guaranteed return, and can move as bonds are bought/sold or as interest rates change.

Which fund has a longer track record, SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan or Union Children's Fund?

SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan launched on 2001-12-28, making it older than Union Children's Fund (launched 2023-11-28). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.