PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan - Direct Plan - Growth vs UTI Children's Equity Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option

SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan and UTI Children's Equity Fund are both in the Children s Fund category, from SBI Funds Management Limited and UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. respectively. UTI Children's Equity Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.30 percentage points.

SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan - Direct Plan - GrowthUTI Children's Equity Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option
CategoryChildren s FundChildren s Fund
AMCSBI Funds Management LimitedUTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd.
BenchmarkCRISIL Hybrid 35+65 - Aggressive IndexNifty 500 TRI
NAV₹51.7789 (2026-10-28)₹85.6312 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹7,943.968 Cr₹1,056.481 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)1.08%1.38%
Inception2020-09-082008-01-30

Returns

UTI Children's Equity Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (7.0% vs SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan's 24.5%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.

Risk Metrics

UTI Children's Equity Fund has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.

Portfolio Analytics

SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.

Punji Fund Health Score

SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a higher 3-year return, SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan or UTI Children's Equity Fund?

UTI Children's Equity Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 7.0% is higher than SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan's 24.5%. UTI Children's Equity Fund sits in the 18th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 100th percentile for SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.

Which has a lower expense ratio, SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan or UTI Children's Equity Fund?

SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.30 percentage points lower than UTI Children's Equity Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Which fund carries more risk, SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan or UTI Children's Equity Fund?

By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), UTI Children's Equity Fund has been more volatile than SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.91 for SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan vs -0.10 for UTI Children's Equity Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.

Which has higher AUM, SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan or UTI Children's Equity Fund?

SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan has ₹7,944 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹1,056 Cr for UTI Children's Equity Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which fund has a longer track record, SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan or UTI Children's Equity Fund?

UTI Children's Equity Fund launched on 2008-01-30, making it older than SBI Children's Fund - Investment Plan (launched 2020-09-08). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.