COMPARE
Quant Value Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan vs Tata Value Fund -Direct Plan Growth Option
Quant Value Fund and Tata Value Fund - are both in the Value Fund category, from quant Money Managers Limited and Tata Asset Management Limited respectively. Quant Value Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Quant Value Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Quant Value Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.17 percentage points.
| Quant Value Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan | Tata Value Fund -Direct Plan Growth Option | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Value Fund | Value Fund |
| AMC | quant Money Managers Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited |
| Benchmark | Nifty 500 TRI | Nifty 500 TRI |
| NAV | ₹21.8852 (2026-10-28) | ₹374.1743 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹1,852.124 Cr | ₹8,062.67 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 0.91% | 1.08% |
| Inception | 2021-11-10 | 2004-05-17 |
Returns
Quant Value Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (23.3% vs Tata Value Fund -'s 18.6%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
Quant Value Fund has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
| Quant Value Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan | Tata Value Fund -Direct Plan Growth Option | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | 0.49 | 0.22 |
| 3Y Alpha | 7.7462% | 2.0085% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | 18.442% | 14.6436% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | 0.67 | 0.49 |
Portfolio Analytics
Quant Value Fund carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.
| Quant Value Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan | Tata Value Fund -Direct Plan Growth Option | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 25.2741 | 15.6828 |
| P/B Ratio | - | 2.68 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.8064% | 2.3317% |
| Active Share | 96.8% | 79.24% |
| Portfolio Turnover | - | 5666% |
| YTM | 5.3293% | - |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
Quant Value Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, Quant Value Fund or Tata Value Fund -?
Quant Value Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 23.3% is higher than Tata Value Fund -'s 18.6%. Quant Value Fund sits in the 100th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 43rd percentile for Tata Value Fund - - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, Quant Value Fund or Tata Value Fund -?
Quant Value Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.17 percentage points lower than Tata Value Fund -'s. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, Quant Value Fund or Tata Value Fund -?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), Quant Value Fund has been more volatile than Tata Value Fund - over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.49 for Quant Value Fund vs 0.22 for Tata Value Fund -) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, Quant Value Fund or Tata Value Fund -?
Tata Value Fund - has ₹8,063 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹1,852 Cr for Quant Value Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, Quant Value Fund or Tata Value Fund -?
Tata Value Fund - launched on 2004-05-17, making it older than Quant Value Fund (launched 2021-11-10). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.