COMPARE
quant Large & Mid Cap Fund - Growth Option-Direct Plan vs The Wealth Company Large & Mid Cap Fund Direct Growth
quant Large & Mid Cap Fund and The Wealth Company Large & Mid Cap Fund Direct Growth are both in the Large & Mid Cap Fund category, from quant Money Managers Limited and Wealth Company Asset Management Holdings Private Limited respectively. quant Large & Mid Cap Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
quant Large & Mid Cap Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 1.16 percentage points.
| quant Large & Mid Cap Fund - Growth Option-Direct Plan | The Wealth Company Large & Mid Cap Fund Direct Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Large & Mid Cap Fund | Large & Mid Cap Fund |
| AMC | quant Money Managers Limited | Wealth Company Asset Management Holdings Private Limited |
| Benchmark | NIFTY LargeMidcap 250 TRI | NIFTY LargeMidcap 250 TRI |
| NAV | ₹131.6213 (2026-10-28) | ₹9.5186 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹3,297.195 Cr | ₹107.187 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.23% | 2.39% |
| Inception | 2006-11-20 | 2026-05-21 |
Returns
This fund is less than a year old, so there is not yet enough history to calculate rolling returns.
Risk Metrics
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet.
Portfolio Analytics
quant Large & Mid Cap Fund carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.
| quant Large & Mid Cap Fund - Growth Option-Direct Plan | The Wealth Company Large & Mid Cap Fund Direct Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 30.8438 | 28.923 |
| P/B Ratio | 4.4922 | 8.8999 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.3129% | 0.8975% |
| Active Share | 95.91% | 79.04% |
| Portfolio Turnover | - | - |
| YTM | 5.3701% | - |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
The Wealth Company Large & Mid Cap Fund Direct Growth has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a lower expense ratio, quant Large & Mid Cap Fund or The Wealth Company Large & Mid Cap Fund Direct Growth?
quant Large & Mid Cap Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 1.16 percentage points lower than The Wealth Company Large & Mid Cap Fund Direct Growth's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Why don't quant Large & Mid Cap Fund and The Wealth Company Large & Mid Cap Fund Direct Growth show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.
Which has higher AUM, quant Large & Mid Cap Fund or The Wealth Company Large & Mid Cap Fund Direct Growth?
quant Large & Mid Cap Fund has ₹3,297 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹107 Cr for The Wealth Company Large & Mid Cap Fund Direct Growth. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, quant Large & Mid Cap Fund or The Wealth Company Large & Mid Cap Fund Direct Growth?
quant Large & Mid Cap Fund launched on 2006-11-20, making it older than The Wealth Company Large & Mid Cap Fund Direct Growth (launched 2026-05-21). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.