COMPARE
quant Focused Fund - Growth Option-Direct Plan vs SBI Focused Fund - Direct Plan -growth
quant Focused Fund and SBI Focused Fund are both in the Focused Fund category, from quant Money Managers Limited and SBI Funds Management Limited respectively. quant Focused Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. SBI Focused Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
SBI Focused Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 1.14 percentage points.
| quant Focused Fund - Growth Option-Direct Plan | SBI Focused Fund - Direct Plan -growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Focused Fund | Focused Fund |
| AMC | quant Money Managers Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited |
| Benchmark | Nifty 500 TRI | BSE 500 |
| NAV | ₹99.4938 (2026-10-28) | ₹434.5819 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹804.741 Cr | ₹49,853.773 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.98% | 0.84% |
| Inception | 2008-07-03 | 2004-08-23 |
Returns
quant Focused Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (18.6% vs SBI Focused Fund's 16.6%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
quant Focused Fund has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
| quant Focused Fund - Growth Option-Direct Plan | SBI Focused Fund - Direct Plan -growth | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | 0.20 | 0.50 |
| 3Y Alpha | 2.0417% | 5.4197% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | 16.6108% | 11.5472% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | 0.43 | 0.99 |
Portfolio Analytics
SBI Focused Fund carries the higher portfolio YTM.
| quant Focused Fund - Growth Option-Direct Plan | SBI Focused Fund - Direct Plan -growth | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 47.7343 | 24.1021 |
| P/B Ratio | - | 2.24 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.1196% | 0.7809% |
| Active Share | 97.36% | 82.03% |
| Portfolio Turnover | - | 36% |
| YTM | 5.3249% | 5.3459% |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
quant Focused Fund and SBI Focused Fund carry the same Punji Quality grade.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, quant Focused Fund or SBI Focused Fund?
quant Focused Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 18.6% is higher than SBI Focused Fund's 16.6%. quant Focused Fund sits in the 78th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 52nd percentile for SBI Focused Fund - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, quant Focused Fund or SBI Focused Fund?
SBI Focused Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 1.14 percentage points lower than quant Focused Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, quant Focused Fund or SBI Focused Fund?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), quant Focused Fund has been more volatile than SBI Focused Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.20 for quant Focused Fund vs 0.50 for SBI Focused Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, quant Focused Fund or SBI Focused Fund?
SBI Focused Fund has ₹49,854 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹805 Cr for quant Focused Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which has a higher yield to maturity (YTM), quant Focused Fund or SBI Focused Fund?
SBI Focused Fund's portfolio YTM (5.3459%) is higher than quant Focused Fund's. YTM is the weighted-average return a debt fund's current bond holdings would earn if held to maturity, assuming no defaults and coupons reinvested at the same rate - a useful forward-looking yield estimate for debt funds the way rolling CAGR is for equity funds, though it's an estimate based on today's portfolio, not a guaranteed return, and can move as bonds are bought/sold or as interest rates change.
Which fund has a longer track record, quant Focused Fund or SBI Focused Fund?
SBI Focused Fund launched on 2004-08-23, making it older than quant Focused Fund (launched 2008-07-03). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.