COMPARE
quant ELSS Tax Saver Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan vs Sundaram Long Term Tax Advantage Fund Series IV Direct Plan - Growth
quant ELSS Tax Saver Fund and Sundaram Long Term Tax Advantage Fund Series IV are both in the ELSS category, from quant Money Managers Limited and Sundaram Asset Management Company Ltd respectively. Sundaram Long Term Tax Advantage Fund Series IV has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Sundaram Long Term Tax Advantage Fund Series IV has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Sundaram Long Term Tax Advantage Fund Series IV has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.19 percentage points.
| quant ELSS Tax Saver Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan | Sundaram Long Term Tax Advantage Fund Series IV Direct Plan - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | ELSS | ELSS |
| AMC | quant Money Managers Limited | Sundaram Asset Management Company Ltd |
| Benchmark | Nifty 500 TRI | BSE 500 TRI |
| NAV | ₹438.8371 (2026-10-28) | ₹33.9948 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹12,672.457 Cr | ₹19.91 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.21% | 1.02% |
| Inception | 2000-03-08 | 2018-03-27 |
Returns
Sundaram Long Term Tax Advantage Fund Series IV leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (23.6% vs quant ELSS Tax Saver Fund's 21.8%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
Sundaram Long Term Tax Advantage Fund Series IV has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
| quant ELSS Tax Saver Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan | Sundaram Long Term Tax Advantage Fund Series IV Direct Plan - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | 0.30 | 0.05 |
| 3Y Alpha | 3.6173% | 0.0205% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | 16.3364% | 17.1516% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | 0.46 | 0.36 |
Portfolio Analytics
quant ELSS Tax Saver Fund carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.
| quant ELSS Tax Saver Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan | Sundaram Long Term Tax Advantage Fund Series IV Direct Plan - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 30.6655 | 28.2999 |
| P/B Ratio | - | 6.1009 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.4924% | 0.5798% |
| Active Share | 87.89% | 97.44% |
| Portfolio Turnover | - | - |
| YTM | - | - |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
quant ELSS Tax Saver Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, quant ELSS Tax Saver Fund or Sundaram Long Term Tax Advantage Fund Series IV?
Sundaram Long Term Tax Advantage Fund Series IV's 3-year rolling CAGR of 23.6% is higher than quant ELSS Tax Saver Fund's 21.8%. Sundaram Long Term Tax Advantage Fund Series IV sits in the 100th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 90th percentile for quant ELSS Tax Saver Fund - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, quant ELSS Tax Saver Fund or Sundaram Long Term Tax Advantage Fund Series IV?
Sundaram Long Term Tax Advantage Fund Series IV's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.19 percentage points lower than quant ELSS Tax Saver Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, quant ELSS Tax Saver Fund or Sundaram Long Term Tax Advantage Fund Series IV?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), Sundaram Long Term Tax Advantage Fund Series IV has been more volatile than quant ELSS Tax Saver Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.30 for quant ELSS Tax Saver Fund vs 0.05 for Sundaram Long Term Tax Advantage Fund Series IV) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, quant ELSS Tax Saver Fund or Sundaram Long Term Tax Advantage Fund Series IV?
quant ELSS Tax Saver Fund has ₹12,672 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹20 Cr for Sundaram Long Term Tax Advantage Fund Series IV. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, quant ELSS Tax Saver Fund or Sundaram Long Term Tax Advantage Fund Series IV?
quant ELSS Tax Saver Fund launched on 2000-03-08, making it older than Sundaram Long Term Tax Advantage Fund Series IV (launched 2018-03-27). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.