COMPARE
quant Consumption Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan vs quant Quantamental Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan
quant Consumption Fund and quant Quantamental Fund are both in the Sectoral/ Thematic category, from quant Money Managers Limited. quant Quantamental Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
quant Quantamental Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.11 percentage points.
| quant Consumption Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan | quant Quantamental Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Sectoral/ Thematic | Sectoral/ Thematic |
| AMC | quant Money Managers Limited | quant Money Managers Limited |
| Benchmark | Nifty India Consumption TRI | Nifty 200 TRI |
| NAV | ₹9.8997 (2026-10-28) | ₹25.0375 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹171.31 Cr | ₹1,500.234 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.73% | 1.62% |
| Inception | 2024-01-05 | 2021-04-13 |
Returns
Risk Metrics
quant Quantamental Fund has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
| quant Consumption Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan | quant Quantamental Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | -0.55 | 0.32 |
| 3Y Alpha | -9.094% | 4.6204% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | 14.9297% | 16.1535% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | -0.04 | 0.53 |
Portfolio Analytics
quant Consumption Fund carries the higher portfolio YTM.
| quant Consumption Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan | quant Quantamental Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 30.0054 | 23.3822 |
| P/B Ratio | - | - |
| Dividend Yield | 0.777% | 0.8533% |
| Active Share | 95.43% | 94.93% |
| Portfolio Turnover | - | - |
| YTM | 5.3564% | 5.3265% |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
quant Consumption Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a lower expense ratio, quant Consumption Fund or quant Quantamental Fund?
quant Quantamental Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.11 percentage points lower than quant Consumption Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, quant Consumption Fund or quant Quantamental Fund?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), quant Quantamental Fund has been more volatile than quant Consumption Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (-0.55 for quant Consumption Fund vs 0.32 for quant Quantamental Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, quant Consumption Fund or quant Quantamental Fund?
quant Quantamental Fund has ₹1,500 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹171 Cr for quant Consumption Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which has a higher yield to maturity (YTM), quant Consumption Fund or quant Quantamental Fund?
quant Consumption Fund's portfolio YTM (5.3564%) is higher than quant Quantamental Fund's. YTM is the weighted-average return a debt fund's current bond holdings would earn if held to maturity, assuming no defaults and coupons reinvested at the same rate - a useful forward-looking yield estimate for debt funds the way rolling CAGR is for equity funds, though it's an estimate based on today's portfolio, not a guaranteed return, and can move as bonds are bought/sold or as interest rates change.
Which fund has a longer track record, quant Consumption Fund or quant Quantamental Fund?
quant Quantamental Fund launched on 2021-04-13, making it older than quant Consumption Fund (launched 2024-01-05). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.