COMPARE
quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option-Direct Plan vs UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund -Direct Plan - Growth
quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- and UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund - are both in the Aggressive Hybrid Fund category, from quant Money Managers Limited and UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. respectively. quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund - has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund - has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.11 percentage points.
| quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option-Direct Plan | UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund -Direct Plan - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Aggressive Hybrid Fund | Aggressive Hybrid Fund |
| AMC | quant Money Managers Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Benchmark | NIFTY 50 Hybrid Composite Debt 65:35 Index TRI | CRISIL Hybrid 35+65 - Aggressive Index |
| NAV | ₹485.1929 (2026-10-28) | ₹419.1514 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹2,048.692 Cr | ₹6,410.727 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.44% | 1.33% |
| Inception | 2001-02-19 | 1995-01-02 |
Returns
quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (16.2% vs UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund -'s 14.2%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
| quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option-Direct Plan | UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund -Direct Plan - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | 0.31 | 0.18 |
| 3Y Alpha | 5.1313% | 1.1159% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | 12.4945% | 9.8445% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | 0.59 | 0.74 |
Portfolio Analytics
quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.
Punji Fund Health Score
quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- or UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund -?
quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-'s 3-year rolling CAGR of 16.2% is higher than UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund -'s 14.2%. quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- sits in the 90th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 45th percentile for UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund - - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- or UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund -?
UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund -'s direct-plan expense ratio is 0.11 percentage points lower than quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-'s. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- or UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund -?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- has been more volatile than UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund - over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.31 for quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- vs 0.18 for UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund -) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- or UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund -?
UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund - has ₹6,411 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹2,049 Cr for quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- or UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund -?
UTI Aggressive Hybrid Fund - launched on 1995-01-02, making it older than quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- (launched 2001-02-19). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.