COMPARE
qsif Equity Long Short Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan vs Titanium Equity Long-Short Fund Direct Growth
qsif Equity Long Short Fund and Titanium Equity Long-Short Fund Direct Growth are both in the Equity Long-Short Fund category, from Quantum Asset Management Company Private Limited and Motilal Oswal Asset Management Company Limited respectively. Titanium Equity Long-Short Fund Direct Growth has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Titanium Equity Long-Short Fund Direct Growth has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 1.55 percentage points.
| qsif Equity Long Short Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan | Titanium Equity Long-Short Fund Direct Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Equity Long-Short Fund | Equity Long-Short Fund |
| AMC | Quantum Asset Management Company Private Limited | Motilal Oswal Asset Management Company Limited |
| Benchmark | Nifty 500 TRI | Nifty 500 TRI |
| NAV | ₹10.8641 (2026-10-28) | ₹10.0982 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | - | - |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 3.06% | 1.51% |
| Inception | 2025-10-08 | 2026-04-26 |
Returns
This fund is less than a year old, so there is not yet enough history to calculate rolling returns.
Risk Metrics
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet.
Portfolio Analytics
Titanium Equity Long-Short Fund Direct Growth carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.
| qsif Equity Long Short Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan | Titanium Equity Long-Short Fund Direct Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 17.489 | 19.982 |
| P/B Ratio | 4.4922 | - |
| Dividend Yield | 1.8293% | 1.5939% |
| Active Share | - | - |
| Portfolio Turnover | - | - |
| YTM | 5.3423% | - |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
qsif Equity Long Short Fund and Titanium Equity Long-Short Fund Direct Growth carry the same Punji Quality grade.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a lower expense ratio, qsif Equity Long Short Fund or Titanium Equity Long-Short Fund Direct Growth?
Titanium Equity Long-Short Fund Direct Growth's direct-plan expense ratio is 1.55 percentage points lower than qsif Equity Long Short Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Why don't qsif Equity Long Short Fund and Titanium Equity Long-Short Fund Direct Growth show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.
Which fund has a longer track record, qsif Equity Long Short Fund or Titanium Equity Long-Short Fund Direct Growth?
qsif Equity Long Short Fund launched on 2025-10-08, making it older than Titanium Equity Long-Short Fund Direct Growth (launched 2026-04-26). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.