COMPARE
PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund - Direct Plan - Growth vs quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option-Direct Plan
PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund and quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- are both in the Aggressive Hybrid Fund category, from PGIM India Asset Management Private Limite and quant Money Managers Limited respectively. quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.35 percentage points.
| PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option-Direct Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Aggressive Hybrid Fund | Aggressive Hybrid Fund |
| AMC | PGIM India Asset Management Private Limite | quant Money Managers Limited |
| Benchmark | CRISIL Hybrid 35+65 - Aggressive Index | NIFTY 50 Hybrid Composite Debt 65:35 Index TRI |
| NAV | ₹149.6 (2026-10-28) | ₹485.1929 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹189.718 Cr | ₹2,048.692 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.09% | 1.44% |
| Inception | 2004-01-15 | 2001-02-19 |
Returns
quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (16.2% vs PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund's 11.4%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
| PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option-Direct Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | 0.04 | 0.31 |
| 3Y Alpha | -0.2606% | 5.1313% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | 10.2164% | 12.4945% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | 0.59 | 0.59 |
Portfolio Analytics
PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund carries the higher portfolio YTM.
| PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option-Direct Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 26.6305 | 26.0509 |
| P/B Ratio | 6.656 | - |
| Dividend Yield | 1.157% | 0.5264% |
| Active Share | - | - |
| Portfolio Turnover | 0% | - |
| YTM | 9.99% | 6.5976% |
| Duration (Macaulay) | 3.41 yrs | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund or quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-?
quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-'s 3-year rolling CAGR of 16.2% is higher than PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund's 11.4%. quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- sits in the 90th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 10th percentile for PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund or quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-?
PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.35 percentage points lower than quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-'s. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund or quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- has been more volatile than PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.04 for PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund vs 0.31 for quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund or quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-?
quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- has ₹2,049 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹190 Cr for PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which has a higher yield to maturity (YTM), PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund or quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-?
PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund's portfolio YTM (9.99%) is higher than quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-'s. YTM is the weighted-average return a debt fund's current bond holdings would earn if held to maturity, assuming no defaults and coupons reinvested at the same rate - a useful forward-looking yield estimate for debt funds the way rolling CAGR is for equity funds, though it's an estimate based on today's portfolio, not a guaranteed return, and can move as bonds are bought/sold or as interest rates change.
Which fund has a longer track record, PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund or quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-?
quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- launched on 2001-02-19, making it older than PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund (launched 2004-01-15). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.