COMPARE
Old Bridge Focused Fund - Direct Growth vs SBI Focused Fund - Direct Plan -growth
Old Bridge Focused Fund and SBI Focused Fund are both in the Focused Fund category, from Old Bridge Asset Management Private Limited and SBI Funds Management Limited respectively. SBI Focused Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
SBI Focused Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.21 percentage points.
| Old Bridge Focused Fund - Direct Growth | SBI Focused Fund - Direct Plan -growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Focused Fund | Focused Fund |
| AMC | Old Bridge Asset Management Private Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited |
| Benchmark | BSE 500 TRI | BSE 500 |
| NAV | ₹13.01 (2026-10-28) | ₹434.5819 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹4,462.937 Cr | ₹49,853.773 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.05% | 0.84% |
| Inception | 2024-01-17 | 2004-08-23 |
Returns
Risk Metrics
Old Bridge Focused Fund has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
| Old Bridge Focused Fund - Direct Growth | SBI Focused Fund - Direct Plan -growth | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | 0.13 | 0.50 |
| 3Y Alpha | 1.2823% | 5.4197% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | 16.3463% | 11.5472% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | 0.49 | 0.99 |
Portfolio Analytics
SBI Focused Fund carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.
| Old Bridge Focused Fund - Direct Growth | SBI Focused Fund - Direct Plan -growth | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 21.9642 | 24.1021 |
| P/B Ratio | - | 2.24 |
| Dividend Yield | 1.1605% | 0.7809% |
| Active Share | 88.73% | 82.03% |
| Portfolio Turnover | 18% | 36% |
| YTM | - | 5.3459% |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
Old Bridge Focused Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a lower expense ratio, Old Bridge Focused Fund or SBI Focused Fund?
SBI Focused Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.21 percentage points lower than Old Bridge Focused Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, Old Bridge Focused Fund or SBI Focused Fund?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), Old Bridge Focused Fund has been more volatile than SBI Focused Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.13 for Old Bridge Focused Fund vs 0.50 for SBI Focused Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, Old Bridge Focused Fund or SBI Focused Fund?
SBI Focused Fund has ₹49,854 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹4,463 Cr for Old Bridge Focused Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, Old Bridge Focused Fund or SBI Focused Fund?
SBI Focused Fund launched on 2004-08-23, making it older than Old Bridge Focused Fund (launched 2024-01-17). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.