COMPARE
NJ Value Fund - Direct Growth vs Quant Value Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan
NJ Value Fund and Quant Value Fund are both in the Value Fund category, from NJ Asset Management Private Limited and quant Money Managers Limited respectively. Quant Value Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Quant Value Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 1.48 percentage points.
| NJ Value Fund - Direct Growth | Quant Value Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Value Fund | Value Fund |
| AMC | NJ Asset Management Private Limited | quant Money Managers Limited |
| Benchmark | Nifty 500 TRI | Nifty 500 TRI |
| NAV | ₹9.09 (2026-10-28) | ₹21.8852 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹214.14 Cr | ₹1,852.124 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 2.39% | 0.91% |
| Inception | 2026-07-10 | 2021-11-10 |
Returns
This fund is less than a year old, so there is not yet enough history to calculate rolling returns.
Risk Metrics
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet.
| NJ Value Fund - Direct Growth | Quant Value Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | N/A | 0.49 |
| 3Y Alpha | N/A | 7.7462% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | N/A | 18.442% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | N/A | 0.67 |
Portfolio Analytics
Quant Value Fund carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.
| NJ Value Fund - Direct Growth | Quant Value Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 14.5655 | 25.2741 |
| P/B Ratio | - | - |
| Dividend Yield | 2.0324% | 0.8064% |
| Active Share | 76.94% | 96.8% |
| Portfolio Turnover | 0% | - |
| YTM | - | 5.3293% |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
NJ Value Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a lower expense ratio, NJ Value Fund or Quant Value Fund?
Quant Value Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 1.48 percentage points lower than NJ Value Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Why don't NJ Value Fund and Quant Value Fund show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.
Which has higher AUM, NJ Value Fund or Quant Value Fund?
Quant Value Fund has ₹1,852 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹214 Cr for NJ Value Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, NJ Value Fund or Quant Value Fund?
Quant Value Fund launched on 2021-11-10, making it older than NJ Value Fund (launched 2026-07-10). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.