PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- Direct Plan-Growth Option vs Tata Nifty India Digital ETF Fund of Fund-Direct Plan-Growth

Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- and Tata Nifty India Digital ETF Fund of Fund- are both in the FoF Domestic category, from Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited and Tata Asset Management Limited respectively. Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Tata Nifty India Digital ETF Fund of Fund- has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

Tata Nifty India Digital ETF Fund of Fund- has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.08 percentage points.

Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- Direct Plan-Growth OptionTata Nifty India Digital ETF Fund of Fund-Direct Plan-Growth
CategoryFoF DomesticFoF Domestic
AMCNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedTata Asset Management Limited
BenchmarkDomestic Silver Price (SILVERBEES)Nifty India Digital TRI
NAV₹29.2463 (2026-10-28)₹13.6028 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹3,991.359 Cr₹181.57 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)0.22%0.14%
Inception2022-01-132022-03-25

Returns

Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (37.2% vs Tata Nifty India Digital ETF Fund of Fund-'s 17.0%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.

Risk Metrics

This is a fund of funds. Its risk profile belongs to the schemes it holds, not to a benchmark of its own.

Portfolio Analytics

Punji Fund Health Score

Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- and Tata Nifty India Digital ETF Fund of Fund- carry the same Punji Quality grade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a higher 3-year return, Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- or Tata Nifty India Digital ETF Fund of Fund-?

Nippon India Silver ETF FOF-'s 3-year rolling CAGR of 37.2% is higher than Tata Nifty India Digital ETF Fund of Fund-'s 17.0%. Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- sits in the 91st percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 69th percentile for Tata Nifty India Digital ETF Fund of Fund- - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.

Which has a lower expense ratio, Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- or Tata Nifty India Digital ETF Fund of Fund-?

Tata Nifty India Digital ETF Fund of Fund-'s direct-plan expense ratio is 0.08 percentage points lower than Nippon India Silver ETF FOF-'s. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Why don't Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- and Tata Nifty India Digital ETF Fund of Fund- show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?

This is a fund of funds. Its risk profile belongs to the schemes it holds, not to a benchmark of its own. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.

Which has higher AUM, Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- or Tata Nifty India Digital ETF Fund of Fund-?

Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- has ₹3,991 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹182 Cr for Tata Nifty India Digital ETF Fund of Fund-. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which fund has a longer track record, Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- or Tata Nifty India Digital ETF Fund of Fund-?

Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- launched on 2022-01-13, making it older than Tata Nifty India Digital ETF Fund of Fund- (launched 2022-03-25). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.