COMPARE
Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- Direct Plan-Growth Option vs SBI Gold Fund- Direct Plan - Growth
Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- and SBI Gold Fund- are both in the FoF Domestic category, from Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited and SBI Funds Management Limited respectively. Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.03 percentage points.
| Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- Direct Plan-Growth Option | SBI Gold Fund- Direct Plan - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | FoF Domestic | FoF Domestic |
| AMC | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited |
| Benchmark | Domestic Silver Price (SILVERBEES) | Domestic Gold Price (GOLDBEES) |
| NAV | ₹29.2463 (2026-10-28) | ₹43.227 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹3,991.359 Cr | ₹17,133.355 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 0.22% | 0.25% |
| Inception | 2022-01-13 | 2011-08-22 |
Returns
Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (37.2% vs SBI Gold Fund-'s 11.0%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
This is a fund of funds. Its risk profile belongs to the schemes it holds, not to a benchmark of its own.
Portfolio Analytics
Punji Fund Health Score
Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- or SBI Gold Fund-?
Nippon India Silver ETF FOF-'s 3-year rolling CAGR of 37.2% is higher than SBI Gold Fund-'s 11.0%. Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- sits in the 91st percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 35th percentile for SBI Gold Fund- - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- or SBI Gold Fund-?
Nippon India Silver ETF FOF-'s direct-plan expense ratio is 0.03 percentage points lower than SBI Gold Fund-'s. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Why don't Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- and SBI Gold Fund- show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?
This is a fund of funds. Its risk profile belongs to the schemes it holds, not to a benchmark of its own. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.
Which has higher AUM, Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- or SBI Gold Fund-?
SBI Gold Fund- has ₹17,133 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹3,991 Cr for Nippon India Silver ETF FOF-. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- or SBI Gold Fund-?
SBI Gold Fund- launched on 2011-08-22, making it older than Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- (launched 2022-01-13). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.