PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

Nippon India MNC Fund- Direct Plan- Growth Option vs Samco Active Momentum Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option

Nippon India MNC Fund- and Samco Active Momentum Fund are both in the Thematic Fund category, from Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited and Samco Asset Management Private Limited respectively. Nippon India MNC Fund- has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

Nippon India MNC Fund- has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.61 percentage points.

Nippon India MNC Fund- Direct Plan- Growth OptionSamco Active Momentum Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option
CategoryThematic FundThematic Fund
AMCNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedSamco Asset Management Private Limited
BenchmarkNifty MNC TRINifty 500 TRI
NAV₹9.8713 (2026-10-28)₹15.64 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹381.684 Cr₹747.28 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)1.31%1.92%
Inception2025-07-022023-06-15

Returns

Risk Metrics

This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet.

Portfolio Analytics

Nippon India MNC Fund- carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.

Punji Fund Health Score

Nippon India MNC Fund- has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a lower expense ratio, Nippon India MNC Fund- or Samco Active Momentum Fund?

Nippon India MNC Fund-'s direct-plan expense ratio is 0.61 percentage points lower than Samco Active Momentum Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Why don't Nippon India MNC Fund- and Samco Active Momentum Fund show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?

This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.

Which has higher AUM, Nippon India MNC Fund- or Samco Active Momentum Fund?

Samco Active Momentum Fund has ₹747 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹382 Cr for Nippon India MNC Fund-. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which fund has a longer track record, Nippon India MNC Fund- or Samco Active Momentum Fund?

Samco Active Momentum Fund launched on 2023-06-15, making it older than Nippon India MNC Fund- (launched 2025-07-02). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.