PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

Motilal Oswal Nifty Midcap 150 Index Fund - Direct Plan vs UTI Nifty 200 Momentum 30 Index Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option

Motilal Oswal Nifty Midcap 150 Index Fund and UTI Nifty 200 Momentum 30 Index Fund are both in the Index Funds category, from Motilal Oswal Asset Management Company Limited and UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. respectively. Motilal Oswal Nifty Midcap 150 Index Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Motilal Oswal Nifty Midcap 150 Index Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

Motilal Oswal Nifty Midcap 150 Index Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.54 percentage points.

Motilal Oswal Nifty Midcap 150 Index Fund - Direct PlanUTI Nifty 200 Momentum 30 Index Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option
CategoryIndex FundsIndex Funds
AMCMotilal Oswal Asset Management Company LimitedUTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd.
BenchmarkNifty Midcap 150 TRINifty200 Momentum 30 TRI
NAV₹38.2509 (2026-10-28)₹19.7731 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹3,916.61 Cr₹7,493.676 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)0.35%0.89%
Inception2019-08-192021-02-18

Returns

Motilal Oswal Nifty Midcap 150 Index Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (25.0% vs UTI Nifty 200 Momentum 30 Index Fund's 18.1%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.

Risk Metrics

This fund tracks an index, so measuring alpha against that same index would only report its tracking error.

Portfolio Analytics

Motilal Oswal Nifty Midcap 150 Index Fund carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.

Punji Fund Health Score

Motilal Oswal Nifty Midcap 150 Index Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a higher 3-year return, Motilal Oswal Nifty Midcap 150 Index Fund or UTI Nifty 200 Momentum 30 Index Fund?

Motilal Oswal Nifty Midcap 150 Index Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 25.0% is higher than UTI Nifty 200 Momentum 30 Index Fund's 18.1%. Motilal Oswal Nifty Midcap 150 Index Fund sits in the 98th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 81st percentile for UTI Nifty 200 Momentum 30 Index Fund - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.

Which has a lower expense ratio, Motilal Oswal Nifty Midcap 150 Index Fund or UTI Nifty 200 Momentum 30 Index Fund?

Motilal Oswal Nifty Midcap 150 Index Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.54 percentage points lower than UTI Nifty 200 Momentum 30 Index Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Why don't Motilal Oswal Nifty Midcap 150 Index Fund and UTI Nifty 200 Momentum 30 Index Fund show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?

This fund tracks an index, so measuring alpha against that same index would only report its tracking error. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.

Which has higher AUM, Motilal Oswal Nifty Midcap 150 Index Fund or UTI Nifty 200 Momentum 30 Index Fund?

UTI Nifty 200 Momentum 30 Index Fund has ₹7,494 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹3,917 Cr for Motilal Oswal Nifty Midcap 150 Index Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which fund has a longer track record, Motilal Oswal Nifty Midcap 150 Index Fund or UTI Nifty 200 Momentum 30 Index Fund?

Motilal Oswal Nifty Midcap 150 Index Fund launched on 2019-08-19, making it older than UTI Nifty 200 Momentum 30 Index Fund (launched 2021-02-18). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.