COMPARE
Motilal Oswal Large Cap Direct Plan Growth vs Taurus Large Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth
Motilal Oswal Large Cap and Taurus Large Cap Fund are both in the Large Cap Fund category, from Motilal Oswal Asset Management Company Limited and Taurus Asset Management Company Limited respectively. Motilal Oswal Large Cap has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Motilal Oswal Large Cap has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 1.53 percentage points.
| Motilal Oswal Large Cap Direct Plan Growth | Taurus Large Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Large Cap Fund | Large Cap Fund |
| AMC | Motilal Oswal Asset Management Company Limited | Taurus Asset Management Company Limited |
| Benchmark | Nifty 100 TRI | BSE 100 TRI |
| NAV | ₹13.4576 (2026-10-28) | ₹175.81 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹2,900.69 Cr | ₹63.316 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.01% | 2.54% |
| Inception | 2024-01-17 | 2008-05-07 |
Returns
Risk Metrics
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet.
| Motilal Oswal Large Cap Direct Plan Growth | Taurus Large Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | N/A | 0.35 |
| 3Y Alpha | N/A | 3.9538% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | N/A | 13.4823% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | N/A | 0.67 |
Portfolio Analytics
Taurus Large Cap Fund carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.
| Motilal Oswal Large Cap Direct Plan Growth | Taurus Large Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 20.6301 | 21.7514 |
| P/B Ratio | 5.4993 | 6.656 |
| Dividend Yield | 1.3654% | 1.6217% |
| Active Share | 36.42% | 52.65% |
| Portfolio Turnover | 68% | 97% |
| YTM | - | - |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
Motilal Oswal Large Cap has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a lower expense ratio, Motilal Oswal Large Cap or Taurus Large Cap Fund?
Motilal Oswal Large Cap's direct-plan expense ratio is 1.53 percentage points lower than Taurus Large Cap Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Why don't Motilal Oswal Large Cap and Taurus Large Cap Fund show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.
Which has higher AUM, Motilal Oswal Large Cap or Taurus Large Cap Fund?
Motilal Oswal Large Cap has ₹2,901 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹63 Cr for Taurus Large Cap Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, Motilal Oswal Large Cap or Taurus Large Cap Fund?
Taurus Large Cap Fund launched on 2008-05-07, making it older than Motilal Oswal Large Cap (launched 2024-01-17). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.