COMPARE
Motilal Oswal Financial Services Fund- Direct Growth vs quant Quantamental Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan
Motilal Oswal Financial Services Fund- Direct Growth and quant Quantamental Fund are both in the Sectoral/ Thematic category, from Motilal Oswal Asset Management Company Limited and quant Money Managers Limited respectively. Motilal Oswal Financial Services Fund- Direct Growth has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Motilal Oswal Financial Services Fund- Direct Growth has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.33 percentage points.
| Motilal Oswal Financial Services Fund- Direct Growth | quant Quantamental Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Sectoral/ Thematic | Sectoral/ Thematic |
| AMC | Motilal Oswal Asset Management Company Limited | quant Money Managers Limited |
| Benchmark | Nifty Financial Services TRI | Nifty 200 TRI |
| NAV | ₹10.1532 (2026-10-28) | ₹25.0375 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹214.43 Cr | ₹1,500.234 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.29% | 1.62% |
| Inception | 2026-01-27 | 2021-04-13 |
Returns
This fund is less than a year old, so there is not yet enough history to calculate rolling returns.
Risk Metrics
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet.
Portfolio Analytics
quant Quantamental Fund carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.
| Motilal Oswal Financial Services Fund- Direct Growth | quant Quantamental Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 21.1376 | 23.3822 |
| P/B Ratio | - | - |
| Dividend Yield | 0.6332% | 0.8533% |
| Active Share | 63.24% | 94.93% |
| Portfolio Turnover | - | - |
| YTM | - | 5.3265% |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
Motilal Oswal Financial Services Fund- Direct Growth has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a lower expense ratio, Motilal Oswal Financial Services Fund- Direct Growth or quant Quantamental Fund?
Motilal Oswal Financial Services Fund- Direct Growth's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.33 percentage points lower than quant Quantamental Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Why don't Motilal Oswal Financial Services Fund- Direct Growth and quant Quantamental Fund show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.
Which has higher AUM, Motilal Oswal Financial Services Fund- Direct Growth or quant Quantamental Fund?
quant Quantamental Fund has ₹1,500 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹214 Cr for Motilal Oswal Financial Services Fund- Direct Growth. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, Motilal Oswal Financial Services Fund- Direct Growth or quant Quantamental Fund?
quant Quantamental Fund launched on 2021-04-13, making it older than Motilal Oswal Financial Services Fund- Direct Growth (launched 2026-01-27). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.