COMPARE
Mirae Asset Life Cycle Fund 2056 - Direct Plan - Growth vs Zerodha Life Cycle Fund 2041 - Direct - Growth
Mirae Asset Life Cycle Fund 2056 and Zerodha Life Cycle Fund 2041 are both in the Life Cycle Fund category, from Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd and Zerodha Asset Management Private Limited respectively. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
| Mirae Asset Life Cycle Fund 2056 - Direct Plan - Growth | Zerodha Life Cycle Fund 2041 - Direct - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Life Cycle Fund | Life Cycle Fund |
| AMC | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd | Zerodha Asset Management Private Limited |
| Benchmark | Nifty 500 TRI | Nifty 500 TRI |
| NAV | ₹9.976 (2026-10-28) | ₹9.3116 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | - | ₹18.05 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | - | 1.39% |
| Inception | 2026-09-28 | 2026-06-19 |
Returns
This fund is less than a year old, so there is not yet enough history to calculate rolling returns.
Risk Metrics
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet.
Portfolio Analytics
Punji Fund Health Score
Frequently asked questions
Why don't Mirae Asset Life Cycle Fund 2056 and Zerodha Life Cycle Fund 2041 show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.
Which fund has a longer track record, Mirae Asset Life Cycle Fund 2056 or Zerodha Life Cycle Fund 2041?
Zerodha Life Cycle Fund 2041 launched on 2026-06-19, making it older than Mirae Asset Life Cycle Fund 2056 (launched 2026-09-28). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.