PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap Fund - Direct Plan -Growth vs WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund Direct Plan Growth

Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap Fund and WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund are both in the Multi Cap Fund category, from Mahindra Manulife Investment Management Pvt Ltd and WhiteOak Capital Asset Management Limited respectively. Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.04 percentage points.

Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap Fund - Direct Plan -GrowthWhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund Direct Plan Growth
CategoryMulti Cap FundMulti Cap Fund
AMCMahindra Manulife Investment Management Pvt LtdWhiteOak Capital Asset Management Limited
BenchmarkNifty500 Multicap 50:25:25 TRINifty500 Multicap 50:25:25 TRI
NAV₹43.409 (2026-10-28)₹16.064 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹7,285.72 Cr₹4,302.28 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)0.93%0.89%
Inception2017-04-202023-08-31

Returns

Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (22.6% vs WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund's 17.3%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.

Risk Metrics

Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap Fund has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.

Portfolio Analytics

WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.

Punji Fund Health Score

Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a higher 3-year return, Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap Fund or WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund?

Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 22.6% is higher than WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund's 17.3%. Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap Fund sits in the 91st percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 27th percentile for WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.

Which has a lower expense ratio, Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap Fund or WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund?

WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.04 percentage points lower than Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Which fund carries more risk, Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap Fund or WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund?

By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap Fund has been more volatile than WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.43 for Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap Fund vs 0.58 for WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.

Which has higher AUM, Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap Fund or WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund?

Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap Fund has ₹7,286 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹4,302 Cr for WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which fund has a longer track record, Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap Fund or WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund?

Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap Fund launched on 2017-04-20, making it older than WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund (launched 2023-08-31). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.