COMPARE
Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund - Direct Plan - Growth vs Nippon India US Equity Opportunities Fund- Direct Plan- Growth Plan- Growth Option
Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund and Nippon India US Equity Opportunities Fund- are both in the Thematic Fund category, from Mahindra Manulife Investment Management Pvt Ltd and Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited respectively. Nippon India US Equity Opportunities Fund- has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.37 percentage points.
| Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | Nippon India US Equity Opportunities Fund- Direct Plan- Growth Plan- Growth Option | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Thematic Fund | Thematic Fund |
| AMC | Mahindra Manulife Investment Management Pvt Ltd | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Benchmark | Nifty 500 TRI | S&P 500 Index (INR) |
| NAV | ₹15.062 (2026-10-28) | ₹47.5319 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹1,231.8 Cr | ₹796.042 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 0.93% | 1.3% |
| Inception | 2023-08-21 | 2015-07-03 |
Returns
Nippon India US Equity Opportunities Fund- leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (16.9% vs Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund's 16.4%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
Portfolio Analytics
Punji Fund Health Score
Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund or Nippon India US Equity Opportunities Fund-?
Nippon India US Equity Opportunities Fund-'s 3-year rolling CAGR of 16.9% is higher than Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund's 16.4%. Nippon India US Equity Opportunities Fund- sits in the 48th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 42nd percentile for Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund or Nippon India US Equity Opportunities Fund-?
Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.37 percentage points lower than Nippon India US Equity Opportunities Fund-'s. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund or Nippon India US Equity Opportunities Fund-?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund has been more volatile than Nippon India US Equity Opportunities Fund- over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.42 for Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund vs 0.85 for Nippon India US Equity Opportunities Fund-) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund or Nippon India US Equity Opportunities Fund-?
Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund has ₹1,232 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹796 Cr for Nippon India US Equity Opportunities Fund-. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund or Nippon India US Equity Opportunities Fund-?
Nippon India US Equity Opportunities Fund- launched on 2015-07-03, making it older than Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund (launched 2023-08-21). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.