PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

LIC MF Multi Cap Fund-Direct Plan-Growth vs Motilal Oswal Multi Cap Fund-Direct Plan Growth

LIC MF Multi Cap Fund- and Motilal Oswal Multi Cap Fund- are both in the Multi Cap Fund category, from LIC Mutual Fund Asset Management Limited and Motilal Oswal Asset Management Company Limited respectively. LIC MF Multi Cap Fund- has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

LIC MF Multi Cap Fund- has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.43 percentage points.

LIC MF Multi Cap Fund-Direct Plan-GrowthMotilal Oswal Multi Cap Fund-Direct Plan Growth
CategoryMulti Cap FundMulti Cap Fund
AMCLIC Mutual Fund Asset Management LimitedMotilal Oswal Asset Management Company Limited
BenchmarkNifty500 Multicap 50:25:25 TRINifty500 Multicap 50:25:25 TRI
NAV₹18.6482 (2026-10-28)₹14.7939 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹2,148.96 Cr₹4,518.87 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)0.78%1.21%
Inception2022-10-062024-05-28

Returns

Risk Metrics

This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet.

Portfolio Analytics

Motilal Oswal Multi Cap Fund- carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.

Punji Fund Health Score

Motilal Oswal Multi Cap Fund- has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a lower expense ratio, LIC MF Multi Cap Fund- or Motilal Oswal Multi Cap Fund-?

LIC MF Multi Cap Fund-'s direct-plan expense ratio is 0.43 percentage points lower than Motilal Oswal Multi Cap Fund-'s. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Why don't LIC MF Multi Cap Fund- and Motilal Oswal Multi Cap Fund- show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?

This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.

Which has higher AUM, LIC MF Multi Cap Fund- or Motilal Oswal Multi Cap Fund-?

Motilal Oswal Multi Cap Fund- has ₹4,519 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹2,149 Cr for LIC MF Multi Cap Fund-. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which fund has a longer track record, LIC MF Multi Cap Fund- or Motilal Oswal Multi Cap Fund-?

LIC MF Multi Cap Fund- launched on 2022-10-06, making it older than Motilal Oswal Multi Cap Fund- (launched 2024-05-28). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.