COMPARE
LIC MF Large Cap Fund-Direct Plan-Growth vs Taurus Large Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth
LIC MF Large Cap Fund- and Taurus Large Cap Fund are both in the Large Cap Fund category, from LIC Mutual Fund Asset Management Limited and Taurus Asset Management Company Limited respectively. LIC MF Large Cap Fund- has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. LIC MF Large Cap Fund- has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
LIC MF Large Cap Fund- has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 1.15 percentage points.
| LIC MF Large Cap Fund-Direct Plan-Growth | Taurus Large Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Large Cap Fund | Large Cap Fund |
| AMC | LIC Mutual Fund Asset Management Limited | Taurus Asset Management Company Limited |
| Benchmark | Nifty 100 TRI | BSE 100 TRI |
| NAV | ₹58.0788 (2026-10-28) | ₹175.81 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹1,268.546 Cr | ₹63.316 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.39% | 2.54% |
| Inception | 1994-09-01 | 2008-05-07 |
Returns
LIC MF Large Cap Fund- leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (12.9% vs Taurus Large Cap Fund's 12.1%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
Taurus Large Cap Fund has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
| LIC MF Large Cap Fund-Direct Plan-Growth | Taurus Large Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | -0.08 | 0.35 |
| 3Y Alpha | -0.6526% | 3.9538% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | 13.4644% | 13.4823% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | 0.33 | 0.67 |
Portfolio Analytics
LIC MF Large Cap Fund- carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.
| LIC MF Large Cap Fund-Direct Plan-Growth | Taurus Large Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 26.5347 | 21.7514 |
| P/B Ratio | - | 6.656 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.9774% | 1.6217% |
| Active Share | 49.13% | 52.65% |
| Portfolio Turnover | 69% | 97% |
| YTM | - | - |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
Taurus Large Cap Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, LIC MF Large Cap Fund- or Taurus Large Cap Fund?
LIC MF Large Cap Fund-'s 3-year rolling CAGR of 12.9% is higher than Taurus Large Cap Fund's 12.1%. LIC MF Large Cap Fund- sits in the 10th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 3rd percentile for Taurus Large Cap Fund - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, LIC MF Large Cap Fund- or Taurus Large Cap Fund?
LIC MF Large Cap Fund-'s direct-plan expense ratio is 1.15 percentage points lower than Taurus Large Cap Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, LIC MF Large Cap Fund- or Taurus Large Cap Fund?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), Taurus Large Cap Fund has been more volatile than LIC MF Large Cap Fund- over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (-0.08 for LIC MF Large Cap Fund- vs 0.35 for Taurus Large Cap Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, LIC MF Large Cap Fund- or Taurus Large Cap Fund?
LIC MF Large Cap Fund- has ₹1,269 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹63 Cr for Taurus Large Cap Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, LIC MF Large Cap Fund- or Taurus Large Cap Fund?
LIC MF Large Cap Fund- launched on 1994-09-01, making it older than Taurus Large Cap Fund (launched 2008-05-07). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.