COMPARE
LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-Direct Plan-Growth vs Sundaram Multi-Factor Fund - Direct - Growth
LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- and Sundaram Multi-Factor Fund are both in the Sectoral/ Thematic category, from LIC Mutual Fund Asset Management Limited and Sundaram Asset Management Company Ltd respectively. LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.46 percentage points.
| LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-Direct Plan-Growth | Sundaram Multi-Factor Fund - Direct - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Sectoral/ Thematic | Sectoral/ Thematic |
| AMC | LIC Mutual Fund Asset Management Limited | Sundaram Asset Management Company Ltd |
| Benchmark | Nifty Infrastructure TRI | BSE 200 TRI |
| NAV | ₹59.1519 (2026-10-28) | ₹9.3425 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹1,102.82 Cr | ₹765.09 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.33% | 1.79% |
| Inception | 2008-01-31 | 2025-07-02 |
Returns
Risk Metrics
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet.
Portfolio Analytics
LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.
| LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-Direct Plan-Growth | Sundaram Multi-Factor Fund - Direct - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 29.8606 | 18.2267 |
| P/B Ratio | 7.2862 | 15.3738 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.8311% | 1.6286% |
| Active Share | 85.12% | 60.13% |
| Portfolio Turnover | 102% | 16840% |
| YTM | - | - |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
Sundaram Multi-Factor Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a lower expense ratio, LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- or Sundaram Multi-Factor Fund?
LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-'s direct-plan expense ratio is 0.46 percentage points lower than Sundaram Multi-Factor Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Why don't LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- and Sundaram Multi-Factor Fund show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.
Which has higher AUM, LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- or Sundaram Multi-Factor Fund?
LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- has ₹1,103 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹765 Cr for Sundaram Multi-Factor Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- or Sundaram Multi-Factor Fund?
LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- launched on 2008-01-31, making it older than Sundaram Multi-Factor Fund (launched 2025-07-02). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.