COMPARE
LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-Direct Plan-Growth vs quant Business Cycle Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan
LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- and quant Business Cycle Fund are both in the Sectoral/ Thematic category, from LIC Mutual Fund Asset Management Limited and quant Money Managers Limited respectively. LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.12 percentage points.
| LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-Direct Plan-Growth | quant Business Cycle Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Sectoral/ Thematic | Sectoral/ Thematic |
| AMC | LIC Mutual Fund Asset Management Limited | quant Money Managers Limited |
| Benchmark | Nifty Infrastructure TRI | Nifty 500 TRI |
| NAV | ₹59.1519 (2026-10-28) | ₹16.114 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹1,102.82 Cr | ₹889.432 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.33% | 1.45% |
| Inception | 2008-01-31 | 2023-05-12 |
Returns
LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (15.6% vs quant Business Cycle Fund's 14.8%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
| LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-Direct Plan-Growth | quant Business Cycle Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | 0.58 | 0.08 |
| 3Y Alpha | 8.7418% | 0.0335% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | 21.1543% | 17.9715% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | 0.73 | 0.29 |
Portfolio Analytics
LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.
| LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-Direct Plan-Growth | quant Business Cycle Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 29.8606 | 27.689 |
| P/B Ratio | 7.2862 | - |
| Dividend Yield | 0.8311% | 0.575% |
| Active Share | 85.12% | 97.49% |
| Portfolio Turnover | 102% | - |
| YTM | - | 5.3466% |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- or quant Business Cycle Fund?
LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-'s 3-year rolling CAGR of 15.6% is higher than quant Business Cycle Fund's 14.8%. LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- sits in the 34th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 28th percentile for quant Business Cycle Fund - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- or quant Business Cycle Fund?
LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-'s direct-plan expense ratio is 0.12 percentage points lower than quant Business Cycle Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- or quant Business Cycle Fund?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- has been more volatile than quant Business Cycle Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.58 for LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- vs 0.08 for quant Business Cycle Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- or quant Business Cycle Fund?
LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- has ₹1,103 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹889 Cr for quant Business Cycle Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- or quant Business Cycle Fund?
LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- launched on 2008-01-31, making it older than quant Business Cycle Fund (launched 2023-05-12). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.