COMPARE
LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Direct Plan-Growth vs Mahindra Manulife Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan -Growth
LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund- and Mahindra Manulife Aggressive Hybrid Fund are both in the Aggressive Hybrid Fund category, from LIC Mutual Fund Asset Management Limited and Mahindra Manulife Investment Management Pvt Ltd respectively. Mahindra Manulife Aggressive Hybrid Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Mahindra Manulife Aggressive Hybrid Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Mahindra Manulife Aggressive Hybrid Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.88 percentage points.
| LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Direct Plan-Growth | Mahindra Manulife Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan -Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Aggressive Hybrid Fund | Aggressive Hybrid Fund |
| AMC | LIC Mutual Fund Asset Management Limited | Mahindra Manulife Investment Management Pvt Ltd |
| Benchmark | CRISIL Hybrid 35+65 - Aggressive Index | CRISIL Hybrid 35+65 - Aggressive Index |
| NAV | ₹223.8801 (2026-10-28) | ₹28.4575 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹540.648 Cr | ₹2,791.45 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.74% | 0.86% |
| Inception | 1991-01-01 | 2019-06-28 |
Returns
Mahindra Manulife Aggressive Hybrid Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (19.4% vs LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund-'s 10.9%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund- has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
| LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Direct Plan-Growth | Mahindra Manulife Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan -Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | 0.18 | 0.20 |
| 3Y Alpha | 1.2766% | 1.4493% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | 11.5666% | 10.5162% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | 0.60 | 0.75 |
Portfolio Analytics
LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund- carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.
| LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Direct Plan-Growth | Mahindra Manulife Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan -Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 43.8587 | 30.6558 |
| P/B Ratio | 9.9087 | 3.54 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.3228% | 0.642% |
| Active Share | - | - |
| Portfolio Turnover | 57.99999999999999% | 38.5% |
| YTM | - | 8.1418% |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | 2.17 yrs |
Punji Fund Health Score
Mahindra Manulife Aggressive Hybrid Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund- or Mahindra Manulife Aggressive Hybrid Fund?
Mahindra Manulife Aggressive Hybrid Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 19.4% is higher than LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund-'s 10.9%. Mahindra Manulife Aggressive Hybrid Fund sits in the 97th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 3rd percentile for LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund- - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund- or Mahindra Manulife Aggressive Hybrid Fund?
Mahindra Manulife Aggressive Hybrid Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.88 percentage points lower than LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund-'s. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund- or Mahindra Manulife Aggressive Hybrid Fund?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund- has been more volatile than Mahindra Manulife Aggressive Hybrid Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.18 for LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund- vs 0.20 for Mahindra Manulife Aggressive Hybrid Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund- or Mahindra Manulife Aggressive Hybrid Fund?
Mahindra Manulife Aggressive Hybrid Fund has ₹2,791 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹541 Cr for LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund-. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund- or Mahindra Manulife Aggressive Hybrid Fund?
LIC MF Aggressive Hybrid Fund- launched on 1991-01-01, making it older than Mahindra Manulife Aggressive Hybrid Fund (launched 2019-06-28). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.