COMPARE
Kotak Transportation & Logistics Fund-Direct Growth vs quant BFSI Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan
Kotak Transportation & Logistics Fund-Direct Growth and quant BFSI Fund are both in the Sectoral/ Thematic category, from Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. and quant Money Managers Limited respectively. Kotak Transportation & Logistics Fund-Direct Growth has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Kotak Transportation & Logistics Fund-Direct Growth has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.90 percentage points.
| Kotak Transportation & Logistics Fund-Direct Growth | quant BFSI Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Sectoral/ Thematic | Sectoral/ Thematic |
| AMC | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | quant Money Managers Limited |
| Benchmark | Nifty Transportation & Logistics TRI | Nifty Financial Services TRI |
| NAV | ₹11.789 (2026-10-28) | ₹19.4632 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹525.502 Cr | ₹854.191 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.0533% | 1.95% |
| Inception | 2024-11-25 | 2023-06-01 |
Returns
Risk Metrics
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet.
Portfolio Analytics
Kotak Transportation & Logistics Fund-Direct Growth carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.
| Kotak Transportation & Logistics Fund-Direct Growth | quant BFSI Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 25.9919 | 11.7419 |
| P/B Ratio | 10.137 | - |
| Dividend Yield | 1.1693% | 1.5958% |
| Active Share | - | 97.37% |
| Portfolio Turnover | 43.95% | - |
| YTM | - | 5.3279% |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
Kotak Transportation & Logistics Fund-Direct Growth has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a lower expense ratio, Kotak Transportation & Logistics Fund-Direct Growth or quant BFSI Fund?
Kotak Transportation & Logistics Fund-Direct Growth's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.90 percentage points lower than quant BFSI Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Why don't Kotak Transportation & Logistics Fund-Direct Growth and quant BFSI Fund show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.
Which has higher AUM, Kotak Transportation & Logistics Fund-Direct Growth or quant BFSI Fund?
quant BFSI Fund has ₹854 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹526 Cr for Kotak Transportation & Logistics Fund-Direct Growth. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, Kotak Transportation & Logistics Fund-Direct Growth or quant BFSI Fund?
quant BFSI Fund launched on 2023-06-01, making it older than Kotak Transportation & Logistics Fund-Direct Growth (launched 2024-11-25). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.