COMPARE
Kotak Quality Overseas Equity Active FOF - Direct Plan - Growth- vs Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF- Direct Plan- Growth
Kotak Quality Overseas Equity Active FOF and Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF- are both in the FoF Overseas category, from Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. and Navi AMC Limited respectively. Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF- has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF- has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.39 percentage points.
| Kotak Quality Overseas Equity Active FOF - Direct Plan - Growth- | Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF- Direct Plan- Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | FoF Overseas | FoF Overseas |
| AMC | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | Navi AMC Limited |
| Benchmark | MSCI World Index (INR) | CRSP US Total Market Index |
| NAV | ₹11.646 (2026-10-28) | ₹22.9828 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹409.679 Cr | ₹1,065.98 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 0.4603% | 0.07% |
| Inception | 2026-03-06 | 2022-02-04 |
Returns
This fund is less than a year old, so there is not yet enough history to calculate rolling returns.
Risk Metrics
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet.
Portfolio Analytics
Punji Fund Health Score
Kotak Quality Overseas Equity Active FOF has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a lower expense ratio, Kotak Quality Overseas Equity Active FOF or Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF-?
Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF-'s direct-plan expense ratio is 0.39 percentage points lower than Kotak Quality Overseas Equity Active FOF's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Why don't Kotak Quality Overseas Equity Active FOF and Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF- show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.
Which has higher AUM, Kotak Quality Overseas Equity Active FOF or Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF-?
Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF- has ₹1,066 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹410 Cr for Kotak Quality Overseas Equity Active FOF. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, Kotak Quality Overseas Equity Active FOF or Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF-?
Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF- launched on 2022-02-04, making it older than Kotak Quality Overseas Equity Active FOF (launched 2026-03-06). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.