PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

Kotak Income Plus Arbitrage Omni FOF-Direct Plan-Growth vs Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- Direct Plan-Growth Option

Kotak Income Plus Arbitrage Omni FOF- and Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- are both in the FoF Domestic category, from Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. and Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited respectively. Kotak Income Plus Arbitrage Omni FOF- has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Kotak Income Plus Arbitrage Omni FOF- has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

Kotak Income Plus Arbitrage Omni FOF- has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.15 percentage points.

Kotak Income Plus Arbitrage Omni FOF-Direct Plan-GrowthNippon India Silver ETF FOF- Direct Plan-Growth Option
CategoryFoF DomesticFoF Domestic
AMCKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited
BenchmarkNIFTY Composite Debt Index 60% + Nifty 50 Arbitrage TRI 40%Domestic Silver Price (SILVERBEES)
NAV₹13.2412 (2026-10-28)₹29.2463 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹7,829.187 Cr₹3,991.359 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)0.0701%0.22%
Inception2022-10-282022-01-13

Returns

Kotak Income Plus Arbitrage Omni FOF- leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (7.9% vs Nippon India Silver ETF FOF-'s 37.2%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.

Risk Metrics

This is a fund of funds. Its risk profile belongs to the schemes it holds, not to a benchmark of its own.

Portfolio Analytics

Punji Fund Health Score

Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a higher 3-year return, Kotak Income Plus Arbitrage Omni FOF- or Nippon India Silver ETF FOF-?

Kotak Income Plus Arbitrage Omni FOF-'s 3-year rolling CAGR of 7.9% is higher than Nippon India Silver ETF FOF-'s 37.2%. Kotak Income Plus Arbitrage Omni FOF- sits in the 17th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 91st percentile for Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.

Which has a lower expense ratio, Kotak Income Plus Arbitrage Omni FOF- or Nippon India Silver ETF FOF-?

Kotak Income Plus Arbitrage Omni FOF-'s direct-plan expense ratio is 0.15 percentage points lower than Nippon India Silver ETF FOF-'s. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Why don't Kotak Income Plus Arbitrage Omni FOF- and Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?

This is a fund of funds. Its risk profile belongs to the schemes it holds, not to a benchmark of its own. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.

Which has higher AUM, Kotak Income Plus Arbitrage Omni FOF- or Nippon India Silver ETF FOF-?

Kotak Income Plus Arbitrage Omni FOF- has ₹7,829 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹3,991 Cr for Nippon India Silver ETF FOF-. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which fund has a longer track record, Kotak Income Plus Arbitrage Omni FOF- or Nippon India Silver ETF FOF-?

Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- launched on 2022-01-13, making it older than Kotak Income Plus Arbitrage Omni FOF- (launched 2022-10-28). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.