PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

Kotak Focused Fund- Direct Plan- Growth option vs SBI Focused Fund - Direct Plan -growth

Kotak Focused Fund- and SBI Focused Fund are both in the Focused Fund category, from Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. and SBI Funds Management Limited respectively. Kotak Focused Fund- has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Kotak Focused Fund- has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

Kotak Focused Fund- has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.09 percentage points.

Kotak Focused Fund- Direct Plan- Growth optionSBI Focused Fund - Direct Plan -growth
CategoryFocused FundFocused Fund
AMCKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.SBI Funds Management Limited
BenchmarkNifty 500 TRIBSE 500
NAV₹28.425 (2026-10-28)₹434.5819 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹4,261.727 Cr₹49,853.773 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)0.745%0.84%
Inception2019-06-252004-08-23

Returns

Kotak Focused Fund- leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (18.6% vs SBI Focused Fund's 16.6%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.

Risk Metrics

Kotak Focused Fund- has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.

Portfolio Analytics

Kotak Focused Fund- carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.

Punji Fund Health Score

Kotak Focused Fund- and SBI Focused Fund carry the same Punji Quality grade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a higher 3-year return, Kotak Focused Fund- or SBI Focused Fund?

Kotak Focused Fund-'s 3-year rolling CAGR of 18.6% is higher than SBI Focused Fund's 16.6%. Kotak Focused Fund- sits in the 74th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 52nd percentile for SBI Focused Fund - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.

Which has a lower expense ratio, Kotak Focused Fund- or SBI Focused Fund?

Kotak Focused Fund-'s direct-plan expense ratio is 0.09 percentage points lower than SBI Focused Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Which fund carries more risk, Kotak Focused Fund- or SBI Focused Fund?

By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), Kotak Focused Fund- has been more volatile than SBI Focused Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.35 for Kotak Focused Fund- vs 0.50 for SBI Focused Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.

Which has higher AUM, Kotak Focused Fund- or SBI Focused Fund?

SBI Focused Fund has ₹49,854 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹4,262 Cr for Kotak Focused Fund-. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which fund has a longer track record, Kotak Focused Fund- or SBI Focused Fund?

SBI Focused Fund launched on 2004-08-23, making it older than Kotak Focused Fund- (launched 2019-06-25). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.