PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

Kotak Equity Savings Fund - Direct - Growth vs LIC MF Equity Savings Fund-Direct Plan-Growth

Kotak Equity Savings Fund and LIC MF Equity Savings Fund- are both in the Equity Savings category, from Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. and LIC Mutual Fund Asset Management Limited respectively. LIC MF Equity Savings Fund- has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Kotak Equity Savings Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

Kotak Equity Savings Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.81 percentage points.

Kotak Equity Savings Fund - Direct - GrowthLIC MF Equity Savings Fund-Direct Plan-Growth
CategoryEquity SavingsEquity Savings
AMCKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.LIC Mutual Fund Asset Management Limited
BenchmarkNifty Equity Savings TRINifty Equity Savings TRI
NAV₹29.8497 (2026-10-28)₹31.9597 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹10,345.322 Cr₹37.728 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)1.0737%1.88%
Inception2014-09-172011-02-14

Returns

LIC MF Equity Savings Fund- leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (8.6% vs Kotak Equity Savings Fund's 10.3%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.

Risk Metrics

LIC MF Equity Savings Fund- has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.

Portfolio Analytics

LIC MF Equity Savings Fund- carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.

Punji Fund Health Score

Kotak Equity Savings Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a higher 3-year return, Kotak Equity Savings Fund or LIC MF Equity Savings Fund-?

LIC MF Equity Savings Fund-'s 3-year rolling CAGR of 8.6% is higher than Kotak Equity Savings Fund's 10.3%. LIC MF Equity Savings Fund- sits in the 24th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 67th percentile for Kotak Equity Savings Fund - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.

Which has a lower expense ratio, Kotak Equity Savings Fund or LIC MF Equity Savings Fund-?

Kotak Equity Savings Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.81 percentage points lower than LIC MF Equity Savings Fund-'s. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Which fund carries more risk, Kotak Equity Savings Fund or LIC MF Equity Savings Fund-?

By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), LIC MF Equity Savings Fund- has been more volatile than Kotak Equity Savings Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.32 for Kotak Equity Savings Fund vs 0.06 for LIC MF Equity Savings Fund-) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.

Which has higher AUM, Kotak Equity Savings Fund or LIC MF Equity Savings Fund-?

Kotak Equity Savings Fund has ₹10,345 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹38 Cr for LIC MF Equity Savings Fund-. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which fund has a longer track record, Kotak Equity Savings Fund or LIC MF Equity Savings Fund-?

LIC MF Equity Savings Fund- launched on 2011-02-14, making it older than Kotak Equity Savings Fund (launched 2014-09-17). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.