COMPARE
Kotak Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan -Growth vs Union Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option
Kotak Aggressive Hybrid Fund and Union Aggressive Hybrid Fund are both in the Aggressive Hybrid Fund category, from Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. and Union Asset Management Company Private Limited respectively. Kotak Aggressive Hybrid Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Kotak Aggressive Hybrid Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Kotak Aggressive Hybrid Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.98 percentage points.
| Kotak Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan -Growth | Union Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Aggressive Hybrid Fund | Aggressive Hybrid Fund |
| AMC | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | Union Asset Management Company Private Limited |
| Benchmark | NIFTY 50 Hybrid Composite Debt 65:35 Index TRI | CRISIL Hybrid 35+65 - Aggressive Index |
| NAV | ₹73.43 (2026-10-28) | ₹19.1 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹9,025.015 Cr | ₹716.077 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 0.6492% | 1.63% |
| Inception | 1999-11-29 | 2020-11-27 |
Returns
Kotak Aggressive Hybrid Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (15.7% vs Union Aggressive Hybrid Fund's 14.1%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
Kotak Aggressive Hybrid Fund has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
| Kotak Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan -Growth | Union Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | 0.29 | 0.14 |
| 3Y Alpha | 4.6124% | 0.7453% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | 11.6538% | 10.6986% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | 0.72 | 0.62 |
Portfolio Analytics
Union Aggressive Hybrid Fund carries the higher portfolio YTM.
| Kotak Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan -Growth | Union Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 23.7734 | 28.4922 |
| P/B Ratio | 9.9087 | 11.4901 |
| Dividend Yield | 1.053% | 0.9189% |
| Active Share | - | - |
| Portfolio Turnover | 50.93% | 115.99999999999999% |
| YTM | 6.48% | 7.7682% |
| Duration (Macaulay) | 2.98 yrs | 3.09 yrs |
Punji Fund Health Score
Kotak Aggressive Hybrid Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, Kotak Aggressive Hybrid Fund or Union Aggressive Hybrid Fund?
Kotak Aggressive Hybrid Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 15.7% is higher than Union Aggressive Hybrid Fund's 14.1%. Kotak Aggressive Hybrid Fund sits in the 79th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 41st percentile for Union Aggressive Hybrid Fund - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, Kotak Aggressive Hybrid Fund or Union Aggressive Hybrid Fund?
Kotak Aggressive Hybrid Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.98 percentage points lower than Union Aggressive Hybrid Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, Kotak Aggressive Hybrid Fund or Union Aggressive Hybrid Fund?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), Kotak Aggressive Hybrid Fund has been more volatile than Union Aggressive Hybrid Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.29 for Kotak Aggressive Hybrid Fund vs 0.14 for Union Aggressive Hybrid Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, Kotak Aggressive Hybrid Fund or Union Aggressive Hybrid Fund?
Kotak Aggressive Hybrid Fund has ₹9,025 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹716 Cr for Union Aggressive Hybrid Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which has a higher yield to maturity (YTM), Kotak Aggressive Hybrid Fund or Union Aggressive Hybrid Fund?
Union Aggressive Hybrid Fund's portfolio YTM (7.7682%) is higher than Kotak Aggressive Hybrid Fund's. YTM is the weighted-average return a debt fund's current bond holdings would earn if held to maturity, assuming no defaults and coupons reinvested at the same rate - a useful forward-looking yield estimate for debt funds the way rolling CAGR is for equity funds, though it's an estimate based on today's portfolio, not a guaranteed return, and can move as bonds are bought/sold or as interest rates change.
Which has longer duration (more interest-rate sensitivity), Kotak Aggressive Hybrid Fund or Union Aggressive Hybrid Fund?
Union Aggressive Hybrid Fund has the longer Macaulay duration of the two, meaning its NAV is more sensitive to interest-rate changes - a longer-duration debt fund tends to gain more when rates fall and lose more when rates rise, compared to a shorter-duration fund. Duration is expressed in years but isn't literally about how long you hold the fund; it's a measure of price sensitivity to rate moves. If you expect rates to fall, the longer-duration fund benefits more; if you expect rates to rise or want to minimize that swing, the shorter-duration fund is the more conservative pick.
Which fund has a longer track record, Kotak Aggressive Hybrid Fund or Union Aggressive Hybrid Fund?
Kotak Aggressive Hybrid Fund launched on 1999-11-29, making it older than Union Aggressive Hybrid Fund (launched 2020-11-27). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.