PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

JM Focused Fund (Direct) - Growth Option vs SBI Focused Fund - Direct Plan -growth

JM Focused Fund (Direct) and SBI Focused Fund are both in the Focused Fund category, from JM Financial Asset Management Limited and SBI Funds Management Limited respectively. JM Focused Fund (Direct) has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. SBI Focused Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

SBI Focused Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.41 percentage points.

JM Focused Fund (Direct) - Growth OptionSBI Focused Fund - Direct Plan -growth
CategoryFocused FundFocused Fund
AMCJM Financial Asset Management LimitedSBI Funds Management Limited
BenchmarkBSE 500 TRIBSE 500
NAV₹22.232 (2026-10-28)₹434.5819 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹262.694 Cr₹49,853.773 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)1.25%0.84%
Inception2008-01-142004-08-23

Returns

JM Focused Fund (Direct) leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (16.8% vs SBI Focused Fund's 16.6%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.

Risk Metrics

JM Focused Fund (Direct) has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.

Portfolio Analytics

JM Focused Fund (Direct) carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.

Punji Fund Health Score

SBI Focused Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a higher 3-year return, JM Focused Fund (Direct) or SBI Focused Fund?

JM Focused Fund (Direct)'s 3-year rolling CAGR of 16.8% is higher than SBI Focused Fund's 16.6%. JM Focused Fund (Direct) sits in the 56th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 52nd percentile for SBI Focused Fund - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.

Which has a lower expense ratio, JM Focused Fund (Direct) or SBI Focused Fund?

SBI Focused Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.41 percentage points lower than JM Focused Fund (Direct)'s. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Which fund carries more risk, JM Focused Fund (Direct) or SBI Focused Fund?

By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), JM Focused Fund (Direct) has been more volatile than SBI Focused Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.08 for JM Focused Fund (Direct) vs 0.50 for SBI Focused Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.

Which has higher AUM, JM Focused Fund (Direct) or SBI Focused Fund?

SBI Focused Fund has ₹49,854 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹263 Cr for JM Focused Fund (Direct). A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which fund has a longer track record, JM Focused Fund (Direct) or SBI Focused Fund?

SBI Focused Fund launched on 2004-08-23, making it older than JM Focused Fund (Direct) (launched 2008-01-14). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.