COMPARE
ITI Multi Asset Allocation Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option vs Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option
ITI Multi Asset Allocation Fund and Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund are both in the Multi Asset Allocation category, from ITI Asset Management Limited and Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited respectively. ITI Multi Asset Allocation Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
ITI Multi Asset Allocation Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.06 percentage points.
| ITI Multi Asset Allocation Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Multi Asset Allocation | Multi Asset Allocation |
| AMC | ITI Asset Management Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Benchmark | CRISIL Hybrid 50+50 - Moderate Index | CRISIL SHORT TERM BOND INDEX |
| NAV | ₹9.5911 (2026-10-28) | ₹25.7138 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹144.74 Cr | ₹18,005.338 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 0.41% | 0.47% |
| Inception | 2026-08-17 | 2020-08-07 |
Returns
This fund is less than a year old, so there is not yet enough history to calculate rolling returns.
Risk Metrics
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet.
Portfolio Analytics
ITI Multi Asset Allocation Fund carries the higher portfolio YTM.
| ITI Multi Asset Allocation Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 31.6648 | 20.3984 |
| P/B Ratio | - | 7.3728 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.5361% | 1.1613% |
| Active Share | - | - |
| Portfolio Turnover | - | 74% |
| YTM | 7.58% | 7.18% |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | 2.33 yrs |
Punji Fund Health Score
ITI Multi Asset Allocation Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a lower expense ratio, ITI Multi Asset Allocation Fund or Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund?
ITI Multi Asset Allocation Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.06 percentage points lower than Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Why don't ITI Multi Asset Allocation Fund and Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.
Which has higher AUM, ITI Multi Asset Allocation Fund or Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund?
Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund has ₹18,005 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹145 Cr for ITI Multi Asset Allocation Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which has a higher yield to maturity (YTM), ITI Multi Asset Allocation Fund or Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund?
ITI Multi Asset Allocation Fund's portfolio YTM (7.58%) is higher than Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund's. YTM is the weighted-average return a debt fund's current bond holdings would earn if held to maturity, assuming no defaults and coupons reinvested at the same rate - a useful forward-looking yield estimate for debt funds the way rolling CAGR is for equity funds, though it's an estimate based on today's portfolio, not a guaranteed return, and can move as bonds are bought/sold or as interest rates change.
Which fund has a longer track record, ITI Multi Asset Allocation Fund or Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund?
Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund launched on 2020-08-07, making it older than ITI Multi Asset Allocation Fund (launched 2026-08-17). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.