PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

ITI Flexi Cap Fund- Direct Plan- Growth vs Quantum Flexi Cap Fund - Direct Plan Growth Option

ITI Flexi Cap Fund- and Quantum Flexi Cap Fund are both in the Flexi Cap Fund category, from ITI Asset Management Limited and Quantum Asset Management Company Private Limited respectively. Quantum Flexi Cap Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

Quantum Flexi Cap Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.36 percentage points.

ITI Flexi Cap Fund- Direct Plan- GrowthQuantum Flexi Cap Fund - Direct Plan Growth Option
CategoryFlexi Cap FundFlexi Cap Fund
AMCITI Asset Management LimitedQuantum Asset Management Company Private Limited
BenchmarkNifty 500 TRIBSE 500 TRI
NAV₹20.2347 (2026-10-28)₹9.5 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹1,581.63 Cr₹65.76 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)0.91%0.55%
Inception2023-01-272026-08-21

Returns

This fund is less than a year old, so there is not yet enough history to calculate rolling returns.

Risk Metrics

This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet.

Portfolio Analytics

ITI Flexi Cap Fund- carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.

Punji Fund Health Score

Quantum Flexi Cap Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a lower expense ratio, ITI Flexi Cap Fund- or Quantum Flexi Cap Fund?

Quantum Flexi Cap Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.36 percentage points lower than ITI Flexi Cap Fund-'s. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Why don't ITI Flexi Cap Fund- and Quantum Flexi Cap Fund show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?

This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.

Which has higher AUM, ITI Flexi Cap Fund- or Quantum Flexi Cap Fund?

ITI Flexi Cap Fund- has ₹1,582 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹66 Cr for Quantum Flexi Cap Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which fund has a longer track record, ITI Flexi Cap Fund- or Quantum Flexi Cap Fund?

ITI Flexi Cap Fund- launched on 2023-01-27, making it older than Quantum Flexi Cap Fund (launched 2026-08-21). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.