PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

Invesco India Infrastructure Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option vs Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund - Direct Plan - Growth

Invesco India Infrastructure Fund and Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund are both in the Thematic Fund category, from Invesco Asset Management (India) Private Limited and Mahindra Manulife Investment Management Pvt Ltd respectively. Invesco India Infrastructure Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.28 percentage points.

Invesco India Infrastructure Fund - Direct Plan - Growth OptionMahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund - Direct Plan - Growth
CategoryThematic FundThematic Fund
AMCInvesco Asset Management (India) Private LimitedMahindra Manulife Investment Management Pvt Ltd
BenchmarkBSE India Infrastructure Index TRINifty 500 TRI
NAV₹75.16 (2026-10-28)₹15.062 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹1,556.92 Cr₹1,231.8 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)1.21%0.93%
Inception2007-09-252023-08-21

Returns

Invesco India Infrastructure Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (22.7% vs Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund's 16.4%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.

Risk Metrics

Invesco India Infrastructure Fund has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.

Portfolio Analytics

Invesco India Infrastructure Fund carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.

Punji Fund Health Score

Invesco India Infrastructure Fund and Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund carry the same Punji Quality grade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a higher 3-year return, Invesco India Infrastructure Fund or Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund?

Invesco India Infrastructure Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 22.7% is higher than Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund's 16.4%. Invesco India Infrastructure Fund sits in the 84th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 42nd percentile for Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.

Which has a lower expense ratio, Invesco India Infrastructure Fund or Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund?

Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.28 percentage points lower than Invesco India Infrastructure Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Which fund carries more risk, Invesco India Infrastructure Fund or Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund?

By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), Invesco India Infrastructure Fund has been more volatile than Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.38 for Invesco India Infrastructure Fund vs 0.42 for Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.

Which has higher AUM, Invesco India Infrastructure Fund or Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund?

Invesco India Infrastructure Fund has ₹1,557 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹1,232 Cr for Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which fund has a longer track record, Invesco India Infrastructure Fund or Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund?

Invesco India Infrastructure Fund launched on 2007-09-25, making it older than Mahindra Manulife Business Cycle Fund (launched 2023-08-21). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.