COMPARE
Invesco India Focused Fund - Direct Plan - Growth vs Old Bridge Focused Fund - Direct Growth
Invesco India Focused Fund and Old Bridge Focused Fund are both in the Focused Fund category, from Invesco Asset Management (India) Private Limited and Old Bridge Asset Management Private Limited respectively. Invesco India Focused Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Invesco India Focused Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.35 percentage points.
| Invesco India Focused Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | Old Bridge Focused Fund - Direct Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Focused Fund | Focused Fund |
| AMC | Invesco Asset Management (India) Private Limited | Old Bridge Asset Management Private Limited |
| Benchmark | BSE 500 TRI | BSE 500 TRI |
| NAV | ₹31.2 (2026-10-28) | ₹13.01 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹6,209.75 Cr | ₹4,462.937 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 0.7% | 1.05% |
| Inception | 2020-09-09 | 2024-01-17 |
Returns
Risk Metrics
Invesco India Focused Fund has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
| Invesco India Focused Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | Old Bridge Focused Fund - Direct Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | 0.66 | 0.13 |
| 3Y Alpha | 10.1064% | 1.2823% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | 16.7167% | 16.3463% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | 0.83 | 0.49 |
Portfolio Analytics
Invesco India Focused Fund carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.
| Invesco India Focused Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | Old Bridge Focused Fund - Direct Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 37.6316 | 21.9642 |
| P/B Ratio | 5.21 | - |
| Dividend Yield | 0.5774% | 1.1605% |
| Active Share | 80.58% | 88.73% |
| Portfolio Turnover | - | 18% |
| YTM | - | - |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
Old Bridge Focused Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a lower expense ratio, Invesco India Focused Fund or Old Bridge Focused Fund?
Invesco India Focused Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.35 percentage points lower than Old Bridge Focused Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, Invesco India Focused Fund or Old Bridge Focused Fund?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), Invesco India Focused Fund has been more volatile than Old Bridge Focused Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.66 for Invesco India Focused Fund vs 0.13 for Old Bridge Focused Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, Invesco India Focused Fund or Old Bridge Focused Fund?
Invesco India Focused Fund has ₹6,210 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹4,463 Cr for Old Bridge Focused Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, Invesco India Focused Fund or Old Bridge Focused Fund?
Invesco India Focused Fund launched on 2020-09-09, making it older than Old Bridge Focused Fund (launched 2024-01-17). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.