COMPARE
Invesco India Financial Services Fund - Direct Plan - Growth vs Nippon India Banking & Financial Services Fund - Direct Plan Growth Plan - Growth Option
Invesco India Financial Services Fund and Nippon India Banking & Financial Services Fund are both in the Sectoral Fund category, from Invesco Asset Management (India) Private Limited and Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited respectively. Invesco India Financial Services Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Invesco India Financial Services Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Invesco India Financial Services Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.11 percentage points.
| Invesco India Financial Services Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | Nippon India Banking & Financial Services Fund - Direct Plan Growth Plan - Growth Option | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Sectoral Fund | Sectoral Fund |
| AMC | Invesco Asset Management (India) Private Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Benchmark | Nifty Financial Services TRI | Nifty Financial Services TRI |
| NAV | ₹166.5 (2026-10-28) | ₹653.7325 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹1,897.85 Cr | ₹7,269.633 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 0.96% | 1.07% |
| Inception | 2008-05-19 | 2003-05-08 |
Returns
Invesco India Financial Services Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (18.6% vs Nippon India Banking & Financial Services Fund's 16.5%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
Invesco India Financial Services Fund has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
Portfolio Analytics
Invesco India Financial Services Fund carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.
Punji Fund Health Score
Invesco India Financial Services Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, Invesco India Financial Services Fund or Nippon India Banking & Financial Services Fund?
Invesco India Financial Services Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 18.6% is higher than Nippon India Banking & Financial Services Fund's 16.5%. Invesco India Financial Services Fund sits in the 44th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 22nd percentile for Nippon India Banking & Financial Services Fund - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, Invesco India Financial Services Fund or Nippon India Banking & Financial Services Fund?
Invesco India Financial Services Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.11 percentage points lower than Nippon India Banking & Financial Services Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, Invesco India Financial Services Fund or Nippon India Banking & Financial Services Fund?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), Invesco India Financial Services Fund has been more volatile than Nippon India Banking & Financial Services Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.44 for Invesco India Financial Services Fund vs 0.14 for Nippon India Banking & Financial Services Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, Invesco India Financial Services Fund or Nippon India Banking & Financial Services Fund?
Nippon India Banking & Financial Services Fund has ₹7,270 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹1,898 Cr for Invesco India Financial Services Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, Invesco India Financial Services Fund or Nippon India Banking & Financial Services Fund?
Nippon India Banking & Financial Services Fund launched on 2003-05-08, making it older than Invesco India Financial Services Fund (launched 2008-05-19). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.