COMPARE
ICICI Prudential Nifty Auto Index Fund - Direct Plan - Growth vs Mirae Asset CRISIL-IBX Financial Services 9-12 Months Debt Index Fund - Direct Plan - Growth
ICICI Prudential Nifty Auto Index Fund and Mirae Asset CRISIL-IBX Financial Services 9-12 Months Debt Index Fund are both in the Index Funds category, from ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited and Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd respectively. Mirae Asset CRISIL-IBX Financial Services 9-12 Months Debt Index Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Mirae Asset CRISIL-IBX Financial Services 9-12 Months Debt Index Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.26 percentage points.
| ICICI Prudential Nifty Auto Index Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | Mirae Asset CRISIL-IBX Financial Services 9-12 Months Debt Index Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Index Funds | Index Funds |
| AMC | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd |
| Benchmark | Nifty Auto TRI | CRISIL-IBX Financial Services 9 to 12 Months Debt Index |
| NAV | ₹20.7892 (2026-10-28) | ₹10.8137 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹226.288 Cr | ₹113.783 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 0.35% | 0.09% |
| Inception | 2022-09-22 | 2025-06-17 |
Returns
Risk Metrics
This fund tracks an index, so measuring alpha against that same index would only report its tracking error.
Portfolio Analytics
Punji Fund Health Score
Mirae Asset CRISIL-IBX Financial Services 9-12 Months Debt Index Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a lower expense ratio, ICICI Prudential Nifty Auto Index Fund or Mirae Asset CRISIL-IBX Financial Services 9-12 Months Debt Index Fund?
Mirae Asset CRISIL-IBX Financial Services 9-12 Months Debt Index Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.26 percentage points lower than ICICI Prudential Nifty Auto Index Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Why don't ICICI Prudential Nifty Auto Index Fund and Mirae Asset CRISIL-IBX Financial Services 9-12 Months Debt Index Fund show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?
This fund tracks an index, so measuring alpha against that same index would only report its tracking error. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.
Which has higher AUM, ICICI Prudential Nifty Auto Index Fund or Mirae Asset CRISIL-IBX Financial Services 9-12 Months Debt Index Fund?
ICICI Prudential Nifty Auto Index Fund has ₹226 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹114 Cr for Mirae Asset CRISIL-IBX Financial Services 9-12 Months Debt Index Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, ICICI Prudential Nifty Auto Index Fund or Mirae Asset CRISIL-IBX Financial Services 9-12 Months Debt Index Fund?
ICICI Prudential Nifty Auto Index Fund launched on 2022-09-22, making it older than Mirae Asset CRISIL-IBX Financial Services 9-12 Months Debt Index Fund (launched 2025-06-17). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.