COMPARE
ICICI Prudential NASDAQ 100 Index Fund - Direct Plan - Growth vs SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund - Direct Plan - Growth
ICICI Prudential NASDAQ 100 Index Fund and SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund are both in the Index Funds category, from ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited and SBI Funds Management Limited respectively. SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.42 percentage points.
| ICICI Prudential NASDAQ 100 Index Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Index Funds | Index Funds |
| AMC | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ 100 (INR) | CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 |
| NAV | ₹24.6745 (2026-10-28) | ₹13.3368 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹3,523.841 Cr | ₹1,969.018 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 0.63% | 0.21% |
| Inception | 2021-09-27 | 2022-09-26 |
Returns
SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (8.1% vs ICICI Prudential NASDAQ 100 Index Fund's 28.8%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
This fund tracks an index, so measuring alpha against that same index would only report its tracking error.
Portfolio Analytics
Punji Fund Health Score
ICICI Prudential NASDAQ 100 Index Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, ICICI Prudential NASDAQ 100 Index Fund or SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund?
SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 8.1% is higher than ICICI Prudential NASDAQ 100 Index Fund's 28.8%. SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund sits in the 42nd percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 99th percentile for ICICI Prudential NASDAQ 100 Index Fund - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, ICICI Prudential NASDAQ 100 Index Fund or SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund?
SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.42 percentage points lower than ICICI Prudential NASDAQ 100 Index Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Why don't ICICI Prudential NASDAQ 100 Index Fund and SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?
This fund tracks an index, so measuring alpha against that same index would only report its tracking error. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.
Which has higher AUM, ICICI Prudential NASDAQ 100 Index Fund or SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund?
ICICI Prudential NASDAQ 100 Index Fund has ₹3,524 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹1,969 Cr for SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, ICICI Prudential NASDAQ 100 Index Fund or SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund?
ICICI Prudential NASDAQ 100 Index Fund launched on 2021-09-27, making it older than SBI CRISIL IBX Gilt Index - April 2029 Fund (launched 2022-09-26). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.