COMPARE
ICICI Prudential Infrastructure Fund - Direct Plan - Growth vs LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-Direct Plan-Growth
ICICI Prudential Infrastructure Fund and LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- are both in the Sectoral/ Thematic category, from ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited and LIC Mutual Fund Asset Management Limited respectively. ICICI Prudential Infrastructure Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. ICICI Prudential Infrastructure Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
ICICI Prudential Infrastructure Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.03 percentage points.
| ICICI Prudential Infrastructure Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-Direct Plan-Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Sectoral/ Thematic | Sectoral/ Thematic |
| AMC | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | LIC Mutual Fund Asset Management Limited |
| Benchmark | BSE India Infrastructure Index TRI | Nifty Infrastructure TRI |
| NAV | ₹199.97 (2026-10-28) | ₹59.1519 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹7,755.42 Cr | ₹1,102.82 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.3% | 1.33% |
| Inception | 2005-07-18 | 2008-01-31 |
Returns
ICICI Prudential Infrastructure Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (18.1% vs LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-'s 15.6%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
| ICICI Prudential Infrastructure Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-Direct Plan-Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | 0.38 | 0.58 |
| 3Y Alpha | 2.3503% | 8.7418% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | 16.2145% | 21.1543% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | 0.69 | 0.73 |
Portfolio Analytics
Punji Fund Health Score
LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, ICICI Prudential Infrastructure Fund or LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-?
ICICI Prudential Infrastructure Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 18.1% is higher than LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-'s 15.6%. ICICI Prudential Infrastructure Fund sits in the 59th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 34th percentile for LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, ICICI Prudential Infrastructure Fund or LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-?
ICICI Prudential Infrastructure Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.03 percentage points lower than LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-'s. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, ICICI Prudential Infrastructure Fund or LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- has been more volatile than ICICI Prudential Infrastructure Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.38 for ICICI Prudential Infrastructure Fund vs 0.58 for LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, ICICI Prudential Infrastructure Fund or LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-?
ICICI Prudential Infrastructure Fund has ₹7,755 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹1,103 Cr for LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, ICICI Prudential Infrastructure Fund or LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-?
ICICI Prudential Infrastructure Fund launched on 2005-07-18, making it older than LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- (launched 2008-01-31). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.