COMPARE
ICICI Prudential Global Stable Equity Fund (FOF) - Direct - Growth vs Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF- Direct Plan- Growth
ICICI Prudential Global Stable Equity Fund (FOF) and Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF- are both in the FoF Overseas category, from ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited and Navi AMC Limited respectively. ICICI Prudential Global Stable Equity Fund (FOF) has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF- has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF- has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.55 percentage points.
| ICICI Prudential Global Stable Equity Fund (FOF) - Direct - Growth | Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF- Direct Plan- Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | FoF Overseas | FoF Overseas |
| AMC | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Navi AMC Limited |
| Benchmark | MSCI World Index | CRSP US Total Market Index |
| NAV | ₹36.78 (2026-10-28) | ₹22.9828 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹92.872 Cr | ₹1,065.98 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 0.62% | 0.07% |
| Inception | 2013-08-27 | 2022-02-04 |
Returns
ICICI Prudential Global Stable Equity Fund (FOF) leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (9.6% vs Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF-'s 23.8%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF- has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
Portfolio Analytics
Punji Fund Health Score
Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF- has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, ICICI Prudential Global Stable Equity Fund (FOF) or Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF-?
ICICI Prudential Global Stable Equity Fund (FOF)'s 3-year rolling CAGR of 9.6% is higher than Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF-'s 23.8%. ICICI Prudential Global Stable Equity Fund (FOF) sits in the 37th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 85th percentile for Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF- - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, ICICI Prudential Global Stable Equity Fund (FOF) or Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF-?
Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF-'s direct-plan expense ratio is 0.55 percentage points lower than ICICI Prudential Global Stable Equity Fund (FOF)'s. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, ICICI Prudential Global Stable Equity Fund (FOF) or Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF-?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF- has been more volatile than ICICI Prudential Global Stable Equity Fund (FOF) over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.81 for ICICI Prudential Global Stable Equity Fund (FOF) vs 1.34 for Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF-) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, ICICI Prudential Global Stable Equity Fund (FOF) or Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF-?
Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF- has ₹1,066 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹93 Cr for ICICI Prudential Global Stable Equity Fund (FOF). A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, ICICI Prudential Global Stable Equity Fund (FOF) or Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF-?
ICICI Prudential Global Stable Equity Fund (FOF) launched on 2013-08-27, making it older than Navi Total Stock Market US Specific Equity Passive FoF- (launched 2022-02-04). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.